Is This Malfeasance in Office By Obama???

The By-Stander President has said over and over “if you like your insurance plan, you can keep it, Period. if you like your doctor you can keep him, Period.” I believe these statement in plain everyday English and Diction to make a clear declarative statement that do stand on their own. These need no interpretation or explanation to be understood. Obama has said this and recorded over 20 times. Now lets look at Malfeasance.

mal·fea·sance
mælˈfizəns/ Show Spelled [mal-fee-zuhns] Show IPA noun Law.
the performance by a public official of an act that is legally unjustified, harmful, or contrary to law; wrongdoing (used especially of an act in violation of a public trust). Compare misfeasance ( def 2 ) , nonfeasance.

Now at least 20 times or more Obama has said this: “If you like your plan, you can keep it PERIOD”

Now, within the last few days, Obama has taken the word “Period” or end of statement and turned it to another New Lie. Now Obama has dropped PERIOD and now has a new qualifier since people have lost their insurance and doctor. The worst is a woman being treated for FOUR YEARS for Cancer lost her plan and can not find another one to replace it.

It is clear the President has Lied, Misled, stretched beyond all recognition THE TRUTH.

Constitution says:
Section II
Section 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Meaning of “High Crimes and Misdemeanors”

by Jon Roland, Constitution Society

The question of impeachment turns on the meaning of the phrase in the Constitution at Art. II Sec. 4, “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors”. I have carefully researched the origin of the phrase “high crimes and misdemeanors” and its meaning to the Framers, and found that the key to understanding it is the word “high”. It does not mean “more serious”. It refers to those punishable offenses that only apply to high persons, that is, to public officials, those who, because of their official status, are under special obligations that ordinary persons are not under, and which could not be meaningfully applied or justly punished if committed by ordinary persons.

Under the English common law tradition, crimes were defined through a legacy of court proceedings and decisions that punished offenses not because they were prohibited by statutes, but because they offended the sense of justice of the people and the court. Whether an offense could qualify as punishable depended largely on the obligations of the offender, and the obligations of a person holding a high position meant that some actions, or inactions, could be punishable if he did them, even though they would not be if done by an ordinary person.

Offenses of this kind survive today in the Uniform Code of Military Justice. It recognizes as punishable offenses such things as perjury of oath, refusal to obey orders, abuse of authority, dereliction of duty, failure to supervise, moral turpitude, and conduct unbecoming. These would not be offenses if committed by a civilian with no official position, but they are offenses which bear on the subject’s fitness for the duties he holds, which he is bound by oath or affirmation to perform.

Perjury is usually defined as “lying under oath”. That is not quite right. The original meaning was “violation of one’s oath (or affirmation)”.

The word “perjury” is usually defined today as “lying under oath about a material matter”, but that is not its original or complete meaning, which is “violation of an oath”. We can see this by consulting the original Latin from which the term comes. From An Elementary Latin Dictionary, by Charlton T. Lewis (1895), Note that the letter “j” is the letter “i” in Latin.
periurium, i, n,, a false oath, perjury.periurus, adj., oath-breaking, false to vows, perjured. iuro, avi, atus, are, to swear, take an oath.iurator, oris, m., a swearer.iuratus, adj., sworn under oath, bound by an oath.ius, iuris, that which is binding, right, justice, duty.per, … IV. Of means or manner, through, by, by means of, … under pretense of, by the pretext of, ….

More here: http://www.constitution.org/cmt/high_crimes.htm

12 Comments

  1. Yes, Barack Obama is guilty of malfeasance over and over again, it’s undeniable, no informed observer doubts it, although ignorant fools, true-believers, Democrat Party loyalists, sycophants of all sorts, and self-interested supporters, including most members of the Fourth Estate pretend his face should be on Mount Rushmore, that is, when they can pry their noses from his neither regions.

    From back before the 2008 elections, Obama’s initial use of illegal campaign contributions when he reneged on his public agreement with John McCain that both of them would adhere to the same funding guidelines, all the way up to today’s blatant lies about ObamaCare, with notable points of gross malfeasance in between (at the Black Panther voter intimidations in Philadelphia, Fast-n-Furious, Benghazi, IRS, and NSA, to name just a few examples) tell the tale of Obama’s malfeasance and put to rest any honest debate on the issue. Obama’s guilty as sin yet remains free of the public stigma of crime and corruption. He’s our first Black President and the Left can’t let him fail, he knows it and it gives him carte blanch to ignore the Constitution, trample on individual rights, spend our grandchildren into debtor’s prisons, and inflict the institutions of socialism on an unwilling and once free people.

    Even if the House was to vote articles of impeachment, which given the cowardice of the GOP’s current crop of so-called leaders is more of a fantasy than Charlie Brown’s Great Pumpkin, corrupt Democrats in the Senate (Is there another kind?) would make sure to deep-six it.

    So, yeah, Obama’s as corrupt as they come, he belongs in jail, and he’s as guilty of multiple acts of malfeasance as Major Nidal Hasan is guilty of shooting down unarmed soldiers in cold blood at Fort Hood. But will he be impeached, unfortunately that’s unlikely. If Speaker Boehner won’t even appoint a special committee to examine the Benghazi cover-up and expose Obama’s malfeasance in the murder of 4 Americans including his refusal to send rescue forces (even ordering those willing to come to the aid our men to stand-down) then the chances the GOP will even discuss impeachment remains in the realm of wishful thinking rather than even a remote possibility.

  2. corrupt Democrats in the Senate (Is there another kind?)

    A redundant redundancy.

    But I agree, the House could Impeach for the symbolism, but the Dems under Hairy Reed would never vote to convict. But the second sound byte from last night was the last straw. And hoping it’s the last straw for the majority of real carbon based life forms (that’s us). Wonder what will happen to us if BO goes heavy on Carbon.

  3. BO has made several Unilateral Changes to Obamacare to appease his Cronies. If you take his changes to the law that have stuck such as delay to Group Insurance, then why isn’t his oft repeated (29 times on video) statement below as another unilateral dictitorial change like the others????

    The By-Stander President has said over and over “if you like your insurance plan, you can keep it, Period. if you like your doctor you can keep him, Period.”

  4. Well, I guess that makes Barack Obama a flat-out liar now don’t it?

    In other news the sun rises in the East, water is wet, OJ did it, and Bill Clinton had sexual relations with that woman, then lied under oath about it. And, he’s still unsure just what the meaning of is is.

  5. ropelight
    Tuesday, 5 November 2013 at 17:10

    Well, I guess that makes Barack Obama a flat-out liar now don’t it?

    In other news the sun rises in the East, water is wet, OJ did it, and Bill Clinton had sexual relations with that woman, then lied under oath about it. And, he’s still unsure just what the meaning of is is.”

    As long as moral and life incompetents can pull a lever and as a result have their patrons dispense to them wealth stolen from others, that client class, and their collaborationist media enablers, will continue to shrug.

    Nothing will change until this human garbage shows up on your doorstep in the middle of the night and informs you that your house is being expropriated for the “use of the people”. And at that, half of those I encounter on a daily basis would meekly climb into a cattle car anyway.

    These people I refer to are not fit for membership in a self-governing community composed of self-governing persons. The left knows it, has cultivated it, and has used it to gain political power. The stupid and amoral function as the fulcrum point by which democracy understood as a rule of law constitutional polity, is transformed into democracy understood as a totalitarian welfare state fit only for termites. All in the name of compassion.

  6. “In other news the sun rises in the East, water is wet, OJ did it, and Bill Clinton had sexual relations with that woman, then lied under oath about it.”

    Yeah. The “war” will be fought I think at the ground level if it is fought at all. This will mean explaining to people we know well, and think we have to live with, just how they are turning human life into insect. This will have consequences, since many we thought were on the same wavelength will then shrug and reveal that they really don’t mind it at all.

    And then come the even more difficult choices about how and with whom to live and plan.

  7. It is a credit to their tenacity DNW, how they took a Great Idea like our Christian based, Constitutional Republic and through the slow and methodical undermining of both tenants managed to create a despotic democracy of the lowest common denominator celebrating whores and run by thieves and liars.

    Next: Amnesty. That should guarantee their new 1000 year Reich.

  8. Meanwhile, back in the real world (and speaking about liars):

    —-
    Lara Logan Admits Her Benghazi Report Was a Mistake
    —By Kevin Drum

    Lara Logan appeared on This Morning a few hours ago to admit that she had been misled by Dylan Davies, a security manager who told her a dramatic story two weeks ago about his actions on the night of the Benghazi attacks last year. Logan made Davies the centerpiece of a 60 Minutes segment about Benghazi, and shortly after it aired we learned that an after-action “incident report” contradicted Davies’ on-air account.
    —–

    Not that this is going to stop you idiots from screaming “BENGAHZI!!!” – God knows, if you can continue to lie about what Fluke said when shown the friggin’ transcript, reality means nothing to you.

  9. When the Commander-in-Chief turns his back on Americans fighting for their lives, when Barack Obama refused to allow our military forces to come to the aid of their brothers in arms who risked their lives trying to save the US Ambassador and his staff, when the Administration concocts a bullshit story about a video tape to cover-up Obama’s treachery, when Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton lie to the parents of the dead Americans they betrayed and abandoned to the terrorists, you can count on the lowest belly crawling cowards and liars to ooze up from the primordial slime to offer manufactured excuses for the turncoats, like flies on a pile of stinking turds.

  10. I would bet Lara Logan is suffering from some sort of anti-Arab PTSD. Afterall, about a year and half or so ago she was reporting the violence in the Cairo Square with Morsi, the Muslim Brotherhood and the public when she was brutally raped by members of the MB. Who knows if she ever mentally got over that and would gladly post an Anti-Arab story on 60 minutes. She may have told her bosses she was over it, but………..

  11. Guys, STOP FEEDING THE TROLL !!!

    Don’t react to stories it posts. Notice how it always tries to completely change the subject every time it starts a post with “Meanwhile, back in the real world”

Comments are closed.