Ethnocentrism in Minnesota

From Ed Morrissey:

MN Congresswoman to Metrodome: Don’t display Redskins name or logo
posted at 11:55 am on October 25, 2013 by

, reminding us yet again how much better we’d have been with Teresa Collett instead. Why is she demanding that the venue of an NFL football game not mention the actual name of the visiting team? Because it’s a taxpayer-financed facility, so it has an obligation to never offend even a single person, or something:

“As you are aware, the Washington team is a privately owned business that chooses to use the disparaging and demeaning brand ‘Redskins’ as their mascot,” McCollum wrote. “In my view this NFL team’s mascot is an unacceptable racial slur disparaging to Native Americans and offensive to Minnesotans.

The congresswoman argued that since the Hubert H. Humphrey Metrodome is financed by taxpayers and has “legal obligations” to ensure no one is offended.

“With regard to the NFL game on November 7th, it would be my hope that all state statutes, ordinances of the City of Minneapolis, and policies of the Minnesota Sports Facilities Authority (MSFA) regarding civil rights, non-discrimination, and affirmative action would be fully reviewed and applied with regard to displaying, publicly announcing, and promoting the Washington team’s racially disparaging name and logo.”

McCollum added that she’s read news reports that “the MSFA may have concerns about limiting the use of the Washington team’s name and logo, as requested by some Native American groups, due to contractual obligations with the NFL.”

“Such concerns should never trump the civil rights and anti-discrimination laws, ordinances, and policies of government bodies charged with defending and advancing the public interest,” she declared.

“The NFL and the owner of Washington’s football team have a right to free speech. Constitutional protections allow them to offend, degrade, and disparage any race, ethic [sp] group, religion, or person of any sexual orientation with their private funds within private spaces,” McCollum continued. “But the people of Minnesota do not have an obligation to open the doors of our public sports facility and allow a for-profit entity to display and promote their racial slur.”

More at the link.

Of course, one might ask what “no one” is offended might mean. Some people might be offended by the outfits that the Minnesota cheerleaders pretend to wear, but they’d just be old fuddy-duddies, and prob’ly white people, so who cares.

Minnesota Vikings logo

But the rather obvious question is: what are Vikings? The Vikings were a population of (very) white northern Europeans, mostly blondes and redheads, so screamingly Caucasian that der Führer would have been proud of them. Should not black Minnesotans, black Americans, and certainly black Vikings players be offended, be outraged, that they are being told, by logo, that the highest standard is to be a blindingly white blonde person?

Of course, Representative McCollum is herself white, so I guess she never noticed how Caucasio-normative she was being. :lol:

Comments are closed.