United States to issue new $100 bill

The new US $100 bill

The new US $100 bill

Here’s the story from The New York Times. But with the shutdown and debt ceiling, I think my design is more appropriate.

66 Comments

  1. Finance
    How Long Do We Have Before Seeing Hyperinflation? One Expert’s Answer May Frighten You
    Oct. 2, 2013 8:45pm Erica Ritz

    David Buckner, the founder and CEO of Bottom Line Training and Consulting, an adjunct professor at Columbia University, and the author of “Permission to Think,” explained on the Glenn Beck Program Wednesday why America hasn’t yet seen hyperinflation — but why it could be just around the corner.

    Buckner said that in discussing hyperinflation, people often refer to the Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia, but say “it could never happen here” because a “certain kind of layering has to occur” that America hasn’t seen.

    That layering, he said, or the “recipe” for hyperinflation, is:

    1) Economic Implosion
    2) Collapse in tax revenues
    3) Raise taxes
    4) Lenders unwilling
    5) Austerity or print

    Beck seemed shocked by the list, saying all five have occurred.

    But Buckner said some still squabble about certain points in the list — and regardless of whether we satisfy the recipe, people still say three things in America are “different,” and set us apart from the standard formula.

    First, it is said that “everyone wants to buy our debt,” and no one will ever stop wanting to do so. But Buckner countered that China is already quickly shifting our debt quickly to gold, and analogized the situation to a restaurant where China, the chef, lends the United States money to eat at its establishment. Pretty soon, he said, there will be other customers, like India, who can pay outright.

    Lot More Here:
    http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/02/how-long-do-we-have-before-seeing-hyperinflation-one-experts-answer-may-frighten-you/

  2. Gentlemen, hyperinflation occurs when a government prints so much currency it becomes worthless. What the Obama regime is doing is creating “cash credits” (for lack of a better definition) not real dollars. Unlike the Weimar Republic, Zimbabwe or Bolivia, we have no over capitalization as in “flood of extra cash” in the market of trade. We have over capitalization in Investments. In the old days they actually had to print money and put it into circulation…not any more. Now they create “cash credits” by computer from thin air and keep printing what they’ve been printing with no noticeable increase in actual cash. In reality what we have is a series of CREDITS given to banks via the federal reserve to allow them to “invest” in whatever given hair-brained idea they decide on without risk. In other words, a pay-off to the loyal Keynesians, socialists, commies, pinkos, unions, Perry, wind mill idiots, global warming dumbasses and Etcetera. The actual economic effect of this flood of phony cash will be about the amount of nothing. Their boys get paid, they get rich, the debt grows, the leftists pat themselves on the back (because they “care”) and the rest of us are no better or worse (till a damn Republican is in office then everything becomes instantly a “crisis”). This is the Grandest payoff scheme ever devised. All brought to you by Obama, Pelosi, Reid and the U.S. Senate. Wish I thought of it first.

    Now all you professional economists out there tell me I’m wrong.

  3. [caption id="attachment_11189" align="alignleft" width="290"]The new US $100 bill The new US $100 bill [/caption] Here’s the story from The New York Times. But with the shutdown and debt ceiling, I think my design is more appropriate.

    This reminds me of a situation when we cleaned out my parent’s house after my father died. My wife, my two sisters-in-law, and my brothers were finding money stashed everywhere in the house. Me? 50 cents in pennies. Then one day cleaning out a box of received greeting cards, it happened. I found my first bill. It was a $100 bill. I was estatic. I finally found more thant 50 cents. However, the problem was it looked just like the $100 bill above :-(

  4. In the old days they actually had to print money and put it into circulation…not any more. Now they create “cash credits” by computer from thin air and keep printing what they’ve been printing with no noticeable increase in actual cash.

    I realise you’re not very smart, but you *do* know central bank reserves don’t actually circulate, right?

  5. The Phoenician demonstrates his brilliance:

    I realise you’re not very smart, but you *do* know central bank reserves don’t actually circulate, right?

    Considering the “quantitative easing” program, in which the Fed is buying up $85 billion in debt instruments, about half of which have been mortgage-backed securities, their funds certainly have been put into circulation, as they are buying them from private investors.

    Of course, being as educated and brilliant as you are, I’m sure you knew that.

  6. When I requested “professional economists out there” to ” tell me I’m wrong” I meant economists, not librarians speaking above their pay grade. I also didn’t say anything about “central bank reserves”, did I? Finally, for the dumbass: there are no central bank reserves it’s all an electronic illusion.

  7. When I requested “professional economists out there” to ” tell me I’m wrong” I meant economists, not librarians speaking above their pay grade.

    Uh-huh.

    Finally, for the dumbass: there are no central bank reserves it’s all an electronic illusion.

    *snicker*

    Yeah, you’re an expert on money. Dumbass.

  8. Yeah, you’re an expert on money. Dumbass.

    The fact that you know how to Google, cut, and paste means only that you know how to Google, cut, and paste. It does not mean you actually know anything about economics. Or anything else, for that matter.

  9. It does not mean you actually know anything about economics.

    It means I know more than a dumbass who says “there are no central bank reserves it’s all an electronic illusion.”

    Or a dumbass who listens to him. How’s the book going, Eric – sold it off to Hollywood for a million dollars yet?

    Loser.

  10. First of all come up with your own word…dumbass is mine specifically reserved for a dumbass like you. You can call me anything you want but when you call me dumbass you call me Phoenician in a time of Romans and that’s just intolerable! You’re the unadulterated, A#1, 100%, pure bread…DUMBASS. You’re a nasty, crude, rude, vulgar, low informed, ignorant, (probably) gay as hell, basement dwelling, small-dicked, commie with no redeeming social value. Plus, you’re a poor, spiteful troll of little consequence and even less class. Other than that you’re probably a pretty nice guy.

    BTW, how’s that non-book that a talentless dumbass could never write and would never even attempt? That’s right, you without talent or ambition think you’re so superior to everyone else. Guess what you little dumbass…Eric is better off trying and failing than you’ll ever be never trying at all but complaining and being envious of those who do. Dumbass! You pollute every blog you enter and poison every thread you post on. You are a cancer on the earth which is why you’re a dumbass. Plus you’re a miserable little bitch, aren’t you? Never anything good to say. Those who know you personally are blessed when you sleep. The rest of us are blessed when you post your dumbass copy and paste citations from fellow dumbasses who travel in your dumbass circle of dumbass losers. Instead of asking Eric about his book why don’t you ask me how the Bentley is driving? It’s gooood, very gooood! Let me tell you something dumbass. If I took a glass of water and plunged my finger into the center of it then removed my finger, the remaining hole would be as significant as you.

  11. Oh, one thing I forgot on my rant Pussy in a time of Penis, you’re not an economist, you’re not a businessman. You have no education or experience at either. Therefore, when you type or cut and paste you look and sound like the fool you are. Come to the table with credentials and experience, then talk….dumbass.

  12. Dumbass in the time of Hoagie says:

    Yeah, you’re an expert on money. Dumbass.

    Well, I’m about thirteen million times the expert on money you are….dumbass.

  13. It means I know more than a dumbass who says “there are no central bank reserves it’s all an electronic illusion.”

    Actually, it means no such thing. The fact that you know how to Google, cut, and paste does NOT mean that:

    1. You understand what the piece is saying, or,
    2. The person writing it isn’t a left wing buffoon like yourself, the sort of person who thinks centralized government planning is the key to economic success, which is, of course, exactly what they had in East Germany and in North Korea today.

  14. you’re not an economist, you’re not a businessman. You have no education or experience at either.

    You’ll notice Pho never demonstrates any REAL WORLD expertise in economics, or anything else. All he knows is how to Google. He’s like the guy who’s read The Hunt For Red October a few times, and now thinks he’s qualified to captain a nuclear submarine.

  15. Instead of asking Eric about his book why don’t you ask me how the Bentley is driving?

    It’s obvious Pho is green with envy, that’s why he keeps bringing up the book thing. Envy and resentment are the perfect emotions for left wing leaders to exploit in their worthless followers. Pho is, pretty much by his own account, a mediocrity. Nor does he seem to have either the brains or the guts to try to be anything better in life. That’s why he’s constantly trying to tear you down. You have succeeded, he has not. Nor is he going to. If he REALLY understood economics, he’d be rich. But, as the saying goes – money talks, bullshit walks. And, with Pho, it’s all bullshit.

  16. To be blunt Eric, I’m a lot older than he and have had a lot more time to do what I did. However, rather than ridicule and belittle others, especially you for writing a book, perhaps his time would be better spent trying a hand at writing his own book. I mean, after all who better to write than a librarian? Now I realize that may cut into his internet trolling time but in the end it could prove much more rewarding than being an international dumbass on the web.

  17. perhaps his time would be better spent trying a hand at writing his own book. I mean, after all who better to write than a librarian? Now I realize that may cut into his internet trolling time but in the end it could prove much more rewarding than being an international dumbass on the web.

    He won’t do it because that requires initiative and risk taking. It means taking the chance you might fail. It means, especially if you’re involved in a creative endeavour, exposing yourself to possible ridicule. It requires enough self-confidence to press on anyway, and yet enough humility to be able to honestly assess your own work.

    A few weeks ago you said Pho could be a decent person if he wanted to. And I happen to believe that, too. But, for the time being at least, he apparently doesn’t want to. Normally I would not knock a person for whatever job they do. If someone enjoys being a librarian, and they’re good at it, more power to them. I’ve certainly worked lesser jobs for less money. But if you’re going to sneer at everyone else as if you are somehow superior, then you’d better have a record of accomplishment to back it up. If you brag about having been a great athlete, then I find out all you did was play 2nd string in high school, then you deserve the ridicule you’re going to get. If Pho knows so much about economics, then where’s the proof of it? If Pho knows so much about writing, then why isn’t he a literary agent? He seems to think that if you can Google, cut, and paste something, that automatically makes you an “Expert”. Like I said earlier, that’s like thinking that, because you’re good at Fantasy Football, you’re qualified to coach in the NFL.

  18. Perhaps this is where he can get out his aggression, so that he can be more polite in real life? I certainly have no way of knowing. I do find it somewhat odd that someone so persuaded of his own intellectual superiority, and similarly convinced that we’re all a bunch of dummies here, keeps coming back.

    Perhaps his occasional periods of absence coincide with finding a girl who’ll put up with him, and his returns mark when he gets dumped? :)

  19. Gotta love the Editor

    Perhaps his occasional periods of absence coincide with finding a girl who’ll put up with him, and his returns mark when he gets dumped?

    How about it marks the point he runs out of money? Company don’t come cheap down under.

  20. It’s actually pretty simple: the money that the Feds are spending is an illusion, but the sheeple are buying the illusion. Perception is reality.

    You’re almost as blindly stupid as Hoagie.

    The Fed’s money is exactly as “real” or as “illusionary” as your bank account balance, and almost as “real” or “illusionary” as the coloured pieces of paper in your wallet you value so much.

    If you were smarter, you’d be arguing on that. the fact that all of you have to go to hilarious ad hominem shows that you realise just how stupid your position is.

  21. It’s obvious Pho is green with envy, that’s why he keeps bringing up the book thing.

    Uh-huh. Well, let’s see -

    If Eric sold a novel to Hollywood for a million dollars, I might be envious.

    Eric has not. Eric has, instead, simply boasted that he will do so.

    Next week I will surely break the world record for the marathon. Do you envy my athleticism?

  22. If Eric sold a novel to Hollywood for a million dollars, I might be envious.

    The difference is, if you turned into a decent person, complimented others (Hoagie, for instance) on their success, wished others well in their endeavours, and THEN, through the use of talent (winning the lottery doesn’t count) achieved a high level of success yourself, then we would NOT be envious, but would instead congratulate you on your success, also.

    But then, that’s the difference between conservatives and left wingers. We are decent people, and you (collectively) are not. We aren’t driven, as you are, by an ideology that thrives on envy and resentment. You could free yourself from that evil ideology and become a decent person, that is, if you want to.

  23. You’re envious of me because I will set a world record for the marathon, Eric.

    When will we see the announcement about you selling your novel to Hollywood?

  24. Phoenician in a time of Romans
    Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 22:25
    You’re envious of me because I will set a world record for the marathon, Eric.

    If you run a 2:02:30 marathon, I will congratulate you on that feat. But you will have to identify yourself with proof. Otherwise, we’ll never know. But what is your real name, and when will the race be run? Otherwise you could just show us results and claim it’s you. So, we ask, what is your real name, when and where is the race? And we need a certified copy of the results. Otherwise, you’re just blowing smoke up our asses. Choice is up to you.

  25. If you run a 2:02:30 marathon, I will congratulate you on that feat. But you will have to identify yourself with proof

    Have you asked to see Eric’s royalty check from Hollywood yet, you senile old fool?

  26. The difference is, if you turned into a decent person, complimented others (Hoagie, for instance) on their success, wished others well in their endeavours,

    “The difference”, Eric?

    Pardon me, but what on earth makes you think that you, Dana, or any other people who condone rants like this:

    —–
    “Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) has made it known that she is promiscuous in her Flucking habits. That makes her, at best, a slut. The fact that she wants me to pay for her Flucking habits makes her, at best, a slut who wants to become a whore. And what is a whore? That is a person who makes others pay for his/her flucking, which is exactly what Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) is attempting to do. She is a slut attempting to become a whore. And she wants the whole nation to pay for her whorring around.

    “Tough titty” said the kitty when the milk ran dry.

    Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) made her bed.
    Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) slept in her bed with who knows how many others.
    Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) needs to clean her own encrusted sheets and not demand others do it for her.

    She wants to be a slut? It’s a free country (but becoming less free day by day as Leftists trash the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution). She can be a slut if she wants to. But since she is trying to become a whore, I say no! I will not pay for her whore services!

    Besides, I seriously doubt her family is proud of her. I seriously doubt they would call her a good Fluck (phonetic spelling) with all her sleeping around and trying to get paid for it.
    —–

    are in any way “decent people”?

    I have contempt for you because you earned it.

  27. Phoenician in a time of Romans
    Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 22:38

    If you run a 2:02:30 marathon, I will congratulate you on that feat. But you will have to identify yourself with proof

    Have you asked to see Eric’s royalty check from Hollywood yet, you senile old fool?

    I take your expected insult as a “no” you will not prove the feat if done, or even if you run it at all. Your response is what I expected. The Troll remains true to his colors as expected.

    1 - yellow A

  28. The print librarian in a time of digital communication wrote:

    I have contempt for you because you earned it.

    Really? Then why do you keep coming back?

    You’ve called some of us stupid, one of us senile, and pretty much all of us worthless, and now — as before — told us that you hold us in contempt, yet you keep knocking on the door, keep coming back, keep coming in. Since we are all just so much beneath your company, why do you keep us company?

    It’s almost as though you have to seek out our companionship because no one will keep you company in person.

  29. I heteronormatively wrote:

    Perhaps his occasional periods of absence coincide with finding a girl who’ll put up with him, and his returns mark when he gets dumped?

    I now realize the error of my ways, and how non-inclusive I was, and shall correct that question: Perhaps his occasional periods of absence coincide with finding a guy who’ll put up with him, and his returns mark when he gets dumped?

    After all, I wouldn’t want anyone to think that I was a heterosexist pig. :lol:

  30. Dumbass in the time of Hoagie says:

    I have contempt for you because you earned it.

    So an opinion about someone who none of us know but who has publicly stated she wants other people to pay for her birth control is contemptible? What a thin skinned dumbass. You know what’s contemptible? When dumbasses and sluts demand the rest of us support their desires. That’s contemptible!

    The real reason for your contempt is that we won’t acquiesce to your Marxist dumbassedness. That we recognize you for what you are; an empty vessel of leftist crap unable to attain any level of personal success who hates anyone who has or even tries to. A cut and paste, Wiki, Urban dictionary dumbass bereft of original thought and capable only of aping the words of other dumbasses to “prove” his point. Congratulations! You have fallen to the level of Supreme Dumbass and have earned all the laughter, scorn and mockery which comes with the position. But enough about you. Bentley’s driving fine, thanks for askin’.

  31. That’s the very same Mr. Editor. Sadly, she needs to go in for her 10,000 mile tomorrow and since it’s Friday I won’t get her back till Monday. Oh, the pain! I’ll be driving the fancy KIA Soul we use for business. Now that’s a looker!

  32. —–
    “Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) has made it known that she is promiscuous in her Flucking habits. That makes her, at best, a slut. The fact that she wants me to pay for her Flucking habits makes her, at best, a slut who wants to become a whore. And what is a whore? That is a person who makes others pay for his/her flucking, which is exactly what Sandra Fluck (phonetic spelling) is attempting to do. She is a slut attempting to become a whore. And she wants the whole nation to pay for her whorring around.

    What?? THIS offends you, this tame bit of insultery? Are you a cloistered nun, or something, who has no contact with popular culture at all?? Are you offended because Gone With The Wind has the word “Damn” at the end? Hell, Saturday Night Live has said worse things about Democrats, and they’re mostly a bunch of liberals! I mean, really! Just spare us the phony outrage already, especially over some harmless PG rated content.

  33. “A few weeks ago you said Pho could be a decent person if he wanted to. And I happen to believe that, too.”

    A generous, but mistaken notion. He’s congenitally effed up, and there’s nothing anyone other than the God he scoffs at, who could, or should, do anything about it.

    Virtually everything the unintelligent dweeb Phoenician seeks while on here, ultimately resolves to his wanting a piece of others’ lives, along with the legal ability to forcibly lay off the burden of his autogenic disorders and pointless existence, onto someone else.

    We recognize and usually pity those who nature or chance have shortchanged. They have burdens to bear, and right thinking people usually have some sympathy for their plight. But on the other hand, a physical and/or emotional debility is no guarantee that the afflicted being has a human character that deserves respect. Some don’t.

    Phoenician in a Time of Romans falls into this latter class. I’m sure if you met him, you would instantly pity him for what he is, i.e. pathetic. But that would be a mistake too. For being pitiful, and being deserving of pity or fellowship, are two different things.

  34. You’re envious of me because I will set a world record for the marathon, Eric.

    Also, you rather conveniently ducked addressing the actual main point of my post. Point being, if you actually WERE a top marathon runner, and you actually DID set a world record, none of us would be envious. Most of us probably wouldn’t even care. That because (and this is the main point you ducked), we conservatives aren’t driven by envy. Other people’s success does not threaten us. We are not that insecure.

    That’s why you will rarely hear a conservative ranting about “Income inequality”. All income equality means is people have economic freedom, and that different people will achieve different levels of success. A conservative isn’t beside himself with envy if Bill Gates makes an extra $5 billion next year, nor (unlike the envy driven left winger) would he cackle with glee if he lost his entire fortune instead.

    But, like I said, Pho. You can abandon your evil left wing ideology any time you want. All it takes is courage and a clear head.

  35. Who would I envy? I envy the late Luciano Pavarotti’s voice.

    I would envy Nolan Ryan’s arm. But those are people who had natural gifts I don’t have, but who worked to develop those gifts into something special.

  36. But those are people who had natural gifts I don’t have, but who worked to develop those gifts into something special.

    True, and as Eric pointed out the beautiful actress, the Nolan Ryan’s, the Pavarotti’s, the Trump’s, Gates’ and many others have abilities and use those abilities to their benefit as well as society’s. Also as Eric pointed out we, as conservatives, don’t envy these people, we admire them and what they’ve done with their talents. We don’t want to take what they have because they have more. The people who bother me are the shit balls like Harry Reid, Obama, Sharpton, lobbyists, and their crony capitalist pigs who have never done a days work and are millionaires by virtue of the taxpayer.

    But the Supreme Dumbass lacks the ability to enjoy the success of others and relishes in their loss or defeat. That’s a pathetic individual. He’s the guy in the SS uniform with the baton moving people to the left for extermination or the right for work camps. Cause he’s better and smarter then they are so he’ll decide who lives and dies. He’s the guy who would encourage Obama to make the supposed shutdown as painful as possible for the American people and having accomplished that would then argue that the very same government that deliberately inflicted pain on it’s people should now control their health care. Let’s see, if they can shut down the WWII memorial, can’t they shut down our health care, just to prove how much we need them? Why would we let them, and by them I mean the Pelosi’s, Obama’s, Reid’s, Dumbasses and Perry’s of the world control our health care. That would be insane. But they are just the type who would be in charge. And BTW, they would exempt themselves!

  37. I do not be aware generate an income appeared right here, nevertheless i thought this particular put up had been beneficial. I really don’t acknowledge whom you could possibly be but ensure a new well-known tumblr if however you usually are not by now. Regards!

  38. I have contempt for you

    Ha ha ha, like we give a shit! I mean, it’s not like you have any morals of your own. Are you so deluded as to think we actually care about your worthless attempts at moral judgment, other than to find them laughable??

  39. Also, you rather conveniently ducked addressing the actual main point of my post. Point being, if you actually WERE a top marathon runner, and you actually DID set a world record, none of us would be envious

    Of course you would be. I offer just as much proof as you do when you *claim* I am envious of you idiots.

  40. ” Dumbass in the time of Hoagie says:

    “I have contempt for you because you earned it.”

    The price Hoagie paid no doubt equals the moral significance of the return provided by the Troll: 0=0.

  41. So an opinion about someone who none of us know but who has publicly stated she wants other people to pay for her birth control is contemptible?

    Once again, Hoagie, you show yourself to be a liar.

    Here’s why your ad hominems about “envy” are so laughable and reveal way more about you than they do about me – your small and twisted personalities – as shown in the need to constantly lie in order to sexually slur a young woman – make my skin crawl. I would no more want to be you than I would want to bathe in maggots.

    You are contemptible.

  42. as shown in the need to constantly lie in order to sexually slur a young woman – make my skin crawl.

    Sure. Just as every cheap shot aimed at Sarah Palin and/or her children made your skin crawl. You’re such a liar and a phony. Don’t come here and pretend that you’re some sort on nun who’s ready to faint at a word like “Slut”, because no one here will believe it for even a second.

  43. Here’s why your ad hominems about “envy” are so laughable

    The only thing “Laughable” is the way you keep evading the issue, trying to change the subject to Sandra Fluck or anything else that is a distraction from the main subject at hand.

  44. I offer just as much proof as you do when you *claim* I am envious of you idiots.

    Pho, your whole ideology is based on envy. That’s all this class warfare crap IS. When a left winger howls about “Income inequality”, what he basically means is “How DARE anyone be more successful than me?”

  45. Frankly Eric, I can’t see how anyone could be less successful than he.

    A dead end government job, poor health, single seemingly with no hope, envious, narcissistic, pathetic and a dumbass. Who I ask, could be less successful. I gave a fiver to a bum on the street last night who had a brighter future.

  46. The Phoenician wrote:

    I would no more want to be you than I would want to bathe in maggots.

    You are contemptible.

    Yet, while you would no more want to be Hoagie, or perhaps any of us, than you would want to bathe in maggots, and you find us all contemptible, you still come by to wallow in what you seem to see as the slop we inhabit. Why is that? What is it that so drives you to seek out those you so despise?

    There have been people in my life that I decided I really didn’t like, and, strange as this reaction might seem to you, I simply stopped associating with them; perhaps they were just as pleased as was I with that arrangement.

    One wonders: did you also stalk and harass girls who dumped you? You kind of seem the type.

  47. I’m wondering that myself Mr. Editor. If we’re so contemptible perhaps he’d be better off harassing others. Isn’t there a dumbass blog in New Zealand he can infest? Although it is fun to watch him twist and turn in the wind all while spewing BS from hard left propaganda sites and insisting they are impartial truth, or even better fact. Besides, who would we get to replace such a dumbass? Who, dammit who?

  48. Although it is fun to watch him twist and turn in the wind all while spewing BS from hard left propaganda sites and insisting they are impartial truth,

    Uh-huh.

    Let’s paraphrase:

    Hoagie: Obama got the US downgraded.

    PiaToR: Here’s a Wikipedia piece showing that the downgrade was due to political brinkmanship over the debt ceiling.

    Hoagie: Huff! Puff! Your source is without merit!

    PiaToR: Here’s the comment from Standard and Poors ITSELF stating what the Wikipedia quoted.

    Hoagie:

    What a bunch of retards you morons are.

  49. What?? THIS offends you, this tame bit of insultery? Are you a cloistered nun, or something, who has no contact with popular culture at all??

    Eric, dear, let me point out the obvious:

    i, Sarah Fluke, a young woman, made a public statement in support of a policy you oppose. She made no comment about her sexual activity. She made no comment about whether she takes contraceptives. She did not ask for anyone to pay for the contraception of the women she spoke for – she wanted it covered by unsubsidised insurance they themselves paid for.

    ii, You wingnuts immediately lied about what she said. You did not engage on the merits of her case; rather, you started ranting with vile ad hominems. And, tellingly, when the person was a young woman, you immediately jumped to sexual slurs and accusations of promiscuity based on the lies you concocted.

    iii, This demonstrates the repulsive truth about your positions and personalities. You are contemptible.

  50. Dumbass, you’re a liar. I never stated Obama got the US downgraded. I stated it occurred on his watch. Don’t they teach librarians reading comprehension down there? Dumbass.

  51. Dumbass, you’re a liar. I never stated Obama got the US downgraded. I stated it occurred on his watch. Don’t they teach librarians reading comprehension down there? Dumbass.

    Uh-huh

    “He is the largest spender in history whether the history books like it or not. Plus, he already managed to get us downgraded and we’re headed that way again.”

    You’re such a goddamned liar.

  52. I love this.

    “[Obama] is the largest spender in history whether the history books like it or not. Plus, he already managed to get us downgraded and we’re headed that way again.” – Hoagie, Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 16:21

    “Dumbass, you’re a liar. I never stated Obama got the US downgraded. I stated it occurred on his watch. Don’t they teach librarians reading comprehension down there? Dumbass.” – Hoagie, Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 22:53

    Is there a better example of just how dishonest you are?

  53. Sorry dumbass, perhaps that was a bad sentence. Kinda like Jefferson wrote the Constitution was. So what? Doesn’t change the fact Obama’s a liar and you’re a dumbass, does it? Doesn’t change the fact he’s the biggest spender or that credit was downgraded under his stewardship.

    You know dumbass, just because someone makes an error does not make him a liar. How is it you manage to see a LIE is an error but you miss all the lies perpetrated by your fellow Marxists? That’s cause you are a D-u-m-b-a-s-s.

    BTW, I’d like to thank you for caring so deeply for every single word I say that you can quote me at will. So you really do think about me all the time. But I do understand it is more important to argue about a sentence than to actually THINK about what a disaster Obama has been . Boy, you are the Supreme Dumbass.

  54. Sarah Fluke

    SARAH Fluke? Little Freudian slip there, Pho, seeing as how I had just mentioned Sarah Palin and about how you, the big phony, had never ridden to HER defense nor ever chastized anyone on your side for attacking her.

    But what really makes your post a bunch of phony crap is the phony chivalry you now display, like a knight in shining armour defending the honor of his lady. You are not a chivalrous person and you come from an ideology that has sneered at the very notion of chivalry for decades. So stop pretending you’re some sort of gentleman looking out for a damsel in distress, because no one’s gonna believe it for a second.

  55. You know dumbass, just because someone makes an error does not make him a liar.

    “[Obama] is the largest spender in history whether the history books like it or not. Plus, he already managed to get us downgraded and we’re headed that way again.” – Hoagie, Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 16:21

    “Dumbass, you’re a liar. I never stated Obama got the US downgraded. I stated it occurred on his watch. Don’t they teach librarians reading comprehension down there? Dumbass.” – Hoagie, Thursday, 10 October 2013 at 22:53

Comments are closed.