Did NSA use its massive surveillance apparatus to hijack the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare?

Crazy ol’ Uncle in the attic is back with an off the wall story. But given all the scandals going on lately, why couldn’t this happen?

Did NSA use its massive surveillance apparatus to hijack the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare?

(By Mike Adams, Natural News) –
“Any analyst at any time can target anyone. Any selector, anywhere… I, sitting at my desk, certainly had the authorities to wiretap anyone, from you or your accountant, to a federal judge, to even the President…” – NSA spy grid whistleblower Edward Snowden.

And so it begins: the power to tap the private phone calls of a federal judge or even the President. All at the fingertips of young NSA analysts who sift through masses of private data collected through the government’s back doors into the servers of Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Apple, Skype, AOL and others. (Here’s the proof.)

But if a 29-year-old working for the NSA could wiretap a federal judge, he could also wiretap a U.S. Supreme Court justice. Anything he found that was embarrassing or even incriminating could be used in a simple blackmail threat to force that justice to change his or her decision on a key issue…

… like Obamacare.

What we’ve learned today forces us to re-examine events of 2012

Back in July of 2012, news headlines were ablaze with the revelation that Supreme Court Justice John Roberts suddenly and unexpectedly changed his decision on Obamacare, siding with big government instead of protecting individual liberties. Many facts surrounding this sudden change of decision raise huge red flags when viewed in the context of the NSA being able to wiretap anyone’s emails, phone calls and private files — including a Supreme Court justice.

As CBS news reported in 2012, “Chief Justice John Roberts initially sided with the Supreme Court’s four conservative justices to strike down the heart of President Obama’s health care reform law, the Affordable Care Act, but later changed his position and formed an alliance with liberals to uphold the bulk of the law, according to two sources with specific knowledge of the deliberations. Roberts then withstood a month-long, desperate campaign to bring him back to his original position, the sources said.”

Read More Here:
http://redflagnews.com/headlines/did-nsa-use-its-massive-surveillance-apparatus-to-hijack-the-supreme-court-decision-on-obamacare

12 Comments

  1. Stranger things have happened. I personally know a retired South African supreme court justice who is in such financial dire straits and whose family has so many skeletons in the closet that if I happened to have committed a crime while he was still a sitting justice, I would have been confident of getting off. I heard today that he’s been approached to come out of retirement.

  2. These sorts of stories have been circulating since Chief Justice Roberts suddenly and inexplicably joined with the Supreme Court’s liberal clique and delivered the deciding vote approving ObamaCare on the basis it was a tax, which was a provision the proponents had firmly denied during the public relations and legislative phase of engineering consent.

    It was the most wrongheaded SCOTUS decision in recent memory and cries out for an explanation. And, since no satisfactory explanation has been forthcoming, wild speculation has naturally arisen to fill the void.

    Clearly, there is an explanation, but Roberts has yet to explain himself. B

  3. Good grief, the NSA reminds me of of HAL in the movie 2001. I wonder how far NSA is into Artificial Intelligence in its Computer Chips. Wonder when Utah will run everything in the Country.

    Google quantum computer lab to study artificial intelligence

    The search giant’s new Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab will be home to a new supercomputer from D-Wave Systems.

    by Lance Whitney
    May 16, 2013 9:45 AM PDT
    Google is opening a new research lab to see if a quantum computer can solve problems too taxing for traditional computers.

    Hosted by NASA’s Ames Research Center, the new Quantum Artificial Intelligence Lab will be home to a quantum computer made by D-Wave Systems. Operated by the Universities Space Research Association, the supercomputer will be available to researchers around the world to work on their own projects

    Read more:
    http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-57584839-93/google-quantum-computer-lab-to-study-artificial-intelligence/

    Just think of the UTAH Data Center only 25% filled with these.

  4. ropelight says:
    Tuesday, 11 June 2013 at 20:46

    My comment continued with, Blackmail remains a possibility.

    OMG, you read my mind. But, but, but, this is the SCOTUS. But I put nothing passed Barry Corleone.

  5. The possible coercion of Chief Justice Roberts centers around the suspicious adoption of two infant children. They were born in Ireland but adopted through a shadowy and circuitous process involving an unnamed Latin American country.

    During his confirmation hearings the New York Times attempted to unseal the records detailing the 2000 adoptions. However, the Times denied the accusations and claimed they only made initial inquiries and did so with great care and understanding and sensitivity…

    The following is from Wikipedia:

    The Times was condemned by the National Council for Adoption, “NCFA denounces, in the strongest possible terms, the shocking decision of the New York Times to investigate the adoption records of Justice John Roberts’ two young children. The adoption community is outraged that, for obviously political reasons, the Times has targeted the very private circumstances, motivations, and processes by which the Roberts became parents.”

    Roberts remains vulnerable to blackmail because Irish law (1991 Adoption Act) limits the adoption of children born in Ireland to residents of Ireland. Roberts isn’t an Irish resident and so the unnamed Latin American country was interposed to circumvent Irish law and constitutes an illegal manipulation of the adoption process. Because Roberts is likely guilty of conspiracy to facilitate an illegal adoption he’s a sitting duck for a blackmail plot, and he remains so.

  6. Why can’t we find one honest person in Government. All they remind me of now is what Cher sang in this song:

    Gypsys, tramps, and thieves
    We’d hear it from the people of the town
    They’d call us Gypsys, tramps, and thieves
    But every night all the men would come around
    And lay their money down

  7. Roberts remains vulnerable to blackmail because Irish law (1991 Adoption Act) limits the adoption of children born in Ireland to residents of Ireland. Roberts isn’t an Irish resident and so the unnamed Latin American country was interposed to circumvent Irish law and constitutes an illegal manipulation of the adoption process. Because Roberts is likely guilty of conspiracy to facilitate an illegal adoption he’s a sitting duck for a blackmail plot, and he remains so.

    Possibly. Though I suspect few people in government are vetted more thoroughly than a Supreme Court Justice. Indeed, I would think the Bush Admin vetted him thoroughly before even nominating him, for the obvious reason they wouldn’t want anything embarrassing to come out.

    Of course, why Roberts caved on the ObaninableCare decision is another matter entirely …

  8. Eric’s right, the vetting process for a SCOTUS nominee should be thorough, almost as thorough as for a candidate for the presidency, but as we know only too well, what should be done with great care and meticulous attention to detail sometimes only gets little more than a cursory glance when it’s big time politics at issue.

  9. ropelight says:
    Thursday, 13 June 2013 at 17:41

    Eric’s right, the vetting process for a SCOTUS nominee should be thorough, almost as thorough as for a candidate for the presidency

    What were the most thorough vettings done for SCOTUS and President? I say it was Bork, Thomas and Bush 43. Beyond a shadow of any doubt, BO had no vetting. So, we got an islamic sympathizer born in Kenya.

Comments are closed.