<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From around the blogroll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/</link>
	<description>President Obama’s real problem was that he ran his mouth, and issued an empty threat. Now, actually doing the right thing in Syria looks like weakness, and the President’s word cannot be either trusted or even taken seriously.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76481</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76481</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Warmist Thinks $1600 A Year Per Person To Pay For HotColdWetDry Is No Big Deal
By William Teach November 23, 2012 – 2:38 pm&lt;/em&gt;

The common denominator of PROGRESSIVES (reality Regressive) is that they have no concern about other people&#039;s money.  If they could tax you 105% they would try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Warmist Thinks $1600 A Year Per Person To Pay For HotColdWetDry Is No Big Deal<br />
By William Teach November 23, 2012 – 2:38 pm</em></p>
<p>The common denominator of PROGRESSIVES (reality Regressive) is that they have no concern about other people&#8217;s money.  If they could tax you 105% they would try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76480</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76480</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;John Hitchcock says:
November 25, 2012 at 13:54  

Anyone with an ounce of integrity can clearly see and will clearly state the fact it is the Leftists who are the most blatantly racist group of political actors (and many times, criminal actors) in the US today, and going back at least 150 years.
 
It’s as plain as the nose on your face.&lt;/em&gt;

It really looked very racist when most of the Dems in 1865 in the House voted AGAINST the 13th Amendment abolishing Slavery.  Republicans (who had a real set then) voted as a bloc FOR.  HMMMMM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>John Hitchcock says:<br />
November 25, 2012 at 13:54  </p>
<p>Anyone with an ounce of integrity can clearly see and will clearly state the fact it is the Leftists who are the most blatantly racist group of political actors (and many times, criminal actors) in the US today, and going back at least 150 years.</p>
<p>It’s as plain as the nose on your face.</em></p>
<p>It really looked very racist when most of the Dems in 1865 in the House voted AGAINST the 13th Amendment abolishing Slavery.  Republicans (who had a real set then) voted as a bloc FOR.  HMMMMM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76479</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2012 02:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76479</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The Editor Sed:
Our friends on the left complain that corporations are legal persons, which simply means that they are entitled to due process of law, but are loathe to consider unborn children to be legal persons, who can thus be killed on a whim&lt;/em&gt;.

Well Michigan has stepped forward and turned Roe v. Wade on its head.  In their Tax Forms for this year has noted that a Fetus is a &quot;Dependent&quot; as far as deduction.  Sounds like they said a &quot;Fetus&quot; has the tax advantage of a real human.  I wonder how Planned UnParenthood will handle this? 8-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The Editor Sed:<br />
Our friends on the left complain that corporations are legal persons, which simply means that they are entitled to due process of law, but are loathe to consider unborn children to be legal persons, who can thus be killed on a whim</em>.</p>
<p>Well Michigan has stepped forward and turned Roe v. Wade on its head.  In their Tax Forms for this year has noted that a Fetus is a &#8220;Dependent&#8221; as far as deduction.  Sounds like they said a &#8220;Fetus&#8221; has the tax advantage of a real human.  I wonder how Planned UnParenthood will handle this? <img src='http://www.journal14.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hitchcock</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76447</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hitchcock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76447</guid>
		<description>Anyone with an ounce of integrity can clearly see and will clearly state the fact it is the Leftists who are the most blatantly racist group of political actors (and many times, criminal actors) in the US today, and going back at least 150 years.

It&#039;s as plain as the nose on your face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone with an ounce of integrity can clearly see and will clearly state the fact it is the Leftists who are the most blatantly racist group of political actors (and many times, criminal actors) in the US today, and going back at least 150 years.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s as plain as the nose on your face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoagie</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76433</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoagie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 17:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76433</guid>
		<description>Picture the famous painting of Napoleon, in an ermine robe, placing the crown on his own head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Picture the famous painting of Napoleon, in an ermine robe, placing the crown on his own head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76428</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 16:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76428</guid>
		<description>Wonder if BO will wear a Purple Robe to the coronation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder if BO will wear a Purple Robe to the coronation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yorkshire</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76419</link>
		<dc:creator>Yorkshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76419</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Editor says:
November 25, 2012 at 09:18  

&lt;strong&gt;Yorkshire makes an interesting slip:&lt;/strong&gt; 

Probably after coronation on Jan 22, 2013.
 
The inauguration is on January 20th, not January 22nd. January 22nd will be the 40th anniversary of Roe v Wade, which is even worst than the re-election of President Obama.
 
Our friends on the left complain that corporations are legal persons, which simply means that they are entitled to due process of law, but are loathe to consider unborn children to be legal persons, who can thus be killed on a whim.&lt;/em&gt;

He needs two days for a few victory laps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Editor says:<br />
November 25, 2012 at 09:18  </p>
<p><strong>Yorkshire makes an interesting slip:</strong> </p>
<p>Probably after coronation on Jan 22, 2013.</p>
<p>The inauguration is on January 20th, not January 22nd. January 22nd will be the 40th anniversary of Roe v Wade, which is even worst than the re-election of President Obama.</p>
<p>Our friends on the left complain that corporations are legal persons, which simply means that they are entitled to due process of law, but are loathe to consider unborn children to be legal persons, who can thus be killed on a whim.</em></p>
<p>He needs two days for a few victory laps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ropelight</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76415</link>
		<dc:creator>ropelight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76415</guid>
		<description>Mr Editor, (in your initial comment) the assertion that &lt;em&gt;Republicans have said the same things about Susan Rice that the Democrats used against Condoleezza Rice&lt;/em&gt; seriously misrepresents Professor Jacobson&#039;s clearly stated conclusions. While he did acknowledge legitimate criticisms of both women in the policy realm, he pointed out: (emphasis added)

&lt;blockquote&gt;In the criticism of Rice, Susan, we have &lt;strong&gt;not seen from Republicans anything approaching the vitriol and crude racial and sexist comments directed at Rice, Condoleezza.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

In addition to Jacobson&#039;s examples of overt race hatred directed at Condoleezza Rice from white Democrat Senators Edward Kennedy, Robert Byrd, and Barbara Boxer, the following is one indication of just how viciously organized black Democrat media react when women and especially minority men and women refuse to kowtow to Democrat expectations of racial solidarity.

In January 2003 Condoleezza Rice accompanied President George W Bush to a black church to celebrate the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. &lt;em&gt;The Black Commentator&lt;/em&gt; responded with hate and indignation.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Aunt Jemima, The Devil&#039;s Handmaiden&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;em&gt;Condoleezza Rice is the purest expression of the race traitor.&lt;/em&gt;

If we cannot be moved to revulsion by brazen acts of treason, then we cannot hope to exercise the power of a coherent political force...&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So viciously racist and sexist was the avalanche of invective unleashed against Condoleezza Rice even in the mainstream media &lt;em&gt;The Independent Woman&#039;s Forum&lt;/em&gt; issued the following statement:

&lt;blockquote&gt;WASHINGTON, DC — The Independent Women’s Forum today denounced as blatantly racist several editorial cartoons featuring Dr. Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor and President Bush’s nominee for Secretary of State. These cartoons clearly draw upon centuries of deep-rooted, wicked and indefensible portrayals of black women.

“The depiction of Dr. Condoleezza Rice by Jeff Danziger, Pat Oliphant and Garry Trudeau as an ebonics speaking, big-lipped, black mammy who just loves her ‘massa’ is a disturbing trend in editorial cartoons,” said Michelle D. Bernard, senior vice president of the Independent Women’s Forum. “These cartoons take the racism of the liberals who profess respect and adoration for black Americans to a new level. It is revolting.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Editor, (in your initial comment) the assertion that <em>Republicans have said the same things about Susan Rice that the Democrats used against Condoleezza Rice</em> seriously misrepresents Professor Jacobson&#8217;s clearly stated conclusions. While he did acknowledge legitimate criticisms of both women in the policy realm, he pointed out: (emphasis added)</p>
<blockquote><p>In the criticism of Rice, Susan, we have <strong>not seen from Republicans anything approaching the vitriol and crude racial and sexist comments directed at Rice, Condoleezza.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>In addition to Jacobson&#8217;s examples of overt race hatred directed at Condoleezza Rice from white Democrat Senators Edward Kennedy, Robert Byrd, and Barbara Boxer, the following is one indication of just how viciously organized black Democrat media react when women and especially minority men and women refuse to kowtow to Democrat expectations of racial solidarity.</p>
<p>In January 2003 Condoleezza Rice accompanied President George W Bush to a black church to celebrate the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. <em>The Black Commentator</em> responded with hate and indignation.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Aunt Jemima, The Devil&#8217;s Handmaiden</strong></p>
<p><em>Condoleezza Rice is the purest expression of the race traitor.</em></p>
<p>If we cannot be moved to revulsion by brazen acts of treason, then we cannot hope to exercise the power of a coherent political force&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>So viciously racist and sexist was the avalanche of invective unleashed against Condoleezza Rice even in the mainstream media <em>The Independent Woman&#8217;s Forum</em> issued the following statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>WASHINGTON, DC — The Independent Women’s Forum today denounced as blatantly racist several editorial cartoons featuring Dr. Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor and President Bush’s nominee for Secretary of State. These cartoons clearly draw upon centuries of deep-rooted, wicked and indefensible portrayals of black women.</p>
<p>“The depiction of Dr. Condoleezza Rice by Jeff Danziger, Pat Oliphant and Garry Trudeau as an ebonics speaking, big-lipped, black mammy who just loves her ‘massa’ is a disturbing trend in editorial cartoons,” said Michelle D. Bernard, senior vice president of the Independent Women’s Forum. “These cartoons take the racism of the liberals who profess respect and adoration for black Americans to a new level. It is revolting.”</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Editor</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76411</link>
		<dc:creator>Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 15:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76411</guid>
		<description>&lt;img style=&quot;padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px;&quot; src=&quot;http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/401174_4624220010867_768388561_n.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt; An image from Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="padding: 0px 10px 0px 10px;" src="http://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/401174_4624220010867_768388561_n.jpg" alt="" align="left" /> An image from Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Koolo</title>
		<link>http://www.journal14.com/2012/11/24/from-around-the-blogroll-17/comment-page-1/#comment-76406</link>
		<dc:creator>Koolo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.journal14.com/?p=6031#comment-76406</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The Left’s Race Baiting Is Bewildering If You Argue Rationally&lt;/blockquote&gt;

And people like Perry get all miffed at &quot;personal attacks&quot; when, as Jonah Goldberg correctly notes, any and all rational discussion with leftists -- when about Dictator Obama or any black government official -- inevitably leads to either insinuations or outright denotations of racism. When you have to deal w/that nonsense on a daily basis, you have no right to be upset if someone refers to you as an &quot;idiot.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The Left’s Race Baiting Is Bewildering If You Argue Rationally</p></blockquote>
<p>And people like Perry get all miffed at &#8220;personal attacks&#8221; when, as Jonah Goldberg correctly notes, any and all rational discussion with leftists &#8212; when about Dictator Obama or any black government official &#8212; inevitably leads to either insinuations or outright denotations of racism. When you have to deal w/that nonsense on a daily basis, you have no right to be upset if someone refers to you as an &#8220;idiot.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
