Skip to content
 

One reason not to vote for Barack Hussein Obama

I saw this chart on Facebook, from some idiots styling themselves the “Anti-Republican Crusaders.” I took one look at it and thought, “There is no better reason to vote for Mitt Romney than this one!”

Yorkshire and Eric know the wealthy lady who kept telling us how much the Europeans wanted us to elect the suave, debonair, much loved and respected John François Kerry in 2004, to replace the wicked George Bush, and I noted that it was perfectly fine with me if Senator Kerry won all of France’s electoral votes. :)

Mr Romney is not running for President of France, and he’s not running for Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, or President of his home country of Kenya; he’s running for President of the United States. You can look at that list, and see a whole list of countries which would like to see the United States weaker rather than stronger; that’s why they favor the candidate who will make us weaker.

We had a good, nice President elected to replace the evil George Bush, one who was supposed to make us loved throughout the world. They gave him the Nobel Peace Prize before he had done one single thing, just because he wasn’t George Bush. Barack Obama went around the world, bowing to foreign princes, apologizing for how bad we were, and telling us how everything was going to be sunshine and light, and you can ask Ambassador Christopher Stevens just how much fornicating good all of that did us.

We elected Barack Hussein Obama, and the Iranians are trying to build atomic bombs. We elected the guy with the Islamic name, who was going to bring peace, and the Palestinians still won’t stop shooting rockets into Israel. We elected a great conciliator, and the Taliban are still trying to take over Afghanistan. We helped the Libyans themselves throw off the yoke of Muammar al-Qadafi. Ask Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith just how much good that did us.

So, no, I don’t see the views of non-Americans, of pretty much anti-Americans, as being anything worth crediting as important or to be paid any respect. We did it their way in 2008, and all we got was a stagnant economy, less respect abroad, and a weaker America.

9 Comments

  1. Wagonwheel says:

    We elected Barack Hussein Obama, and the Iranians are trying to build atomic bombs. We elected the guy with the Islamic name, who was going to bring peace, and the Palestinians still won’t stop shooting rockets into Israel. We elected a great conciliator, and the Taliban are still trying to take over Afghanistan. We helped the Libyans themselves throw off the yoke of Muammar al-Qadafi. Ask Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith just how much good that did us.

    These activities have been going on long before President Obama came on the scene. But I understand well, Mr Editor, that no matter what the President does, you will be opposed, not due to any logic, but due to your partisan extremism. We’ve seen your type in Congress for almost four years now, earning very rightfully the label of dysfunctional. Under your dysfunctional opposition, we have not recovered as rapidly as we otherwise would have, sad to say!

    So, no, I don’t see the views of non-Americans, of pretty much anti-Americans, as being anything worth crediting as important or to be paid any respect. We did it their way in 2008, and all we got was a stagnant economy, less respect abroad, and a weaker America.

    I can only conclude from this statement that you do not hold important having friendly relations with other countries, which has been the mantra for the Republican Party for decades, as in Republicans withholding funding from the United Nations. With the growth of the global economy, it is more important than ever to maintain strong and vibrant relations with our global counterparts. The chart indicates that President Obama and Secretary Clinton have done a good job in foreign relations, a fact which you should acknowledge and cheer.

  2. Eric says:

    Wonder how they feel about Obama in Israel? Bibi is very popular there, but Obama treats him like dirt.

  3. Eric says:

    These activities have been going on long before President Obama came on the scene. But I understand well, Mr Editor, that no matter what the President does, you will be opposed, not due to any logic, but due to your partisan extremism. We’ve seen your type in Congress for almost four years now, earning very rightfully the label of dysfunctional. Under your dysfunctional opposition, we have not recovered as rapidly as we otherwise would have, sad to say!

    The problem is you hate our guts, just like Obama hates Romney. Why should we cooperate with a bunch of haters?

  4. Editor says:

    WW wrote:

    We elected Barack Hussein Obama, and the Iranians are trying to build atomic bombs. We elected the guy with the Islamic name, who was going to bring peace, and the Palestinians still won’t stop shooting rockets into Israel. We elected a great conciliator, and the Taliban are still trying to take over Afghanistan. We helped the Libyans themselves throw off the yoke of Muammar al-Qadafi. Ask Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith just how much good that did us.

    These activities have been going on long before President Obama came on the scene. But I understand well, Mr Editor, that no matter what the President does, you will be opposed, not due to any logic, but due to your partisan extremism. We’ve seen your type in Congress for almost four years now, earning very rightfully the label of dysfunctional. Under your dysfunctional opposition, we have not recovered as rapidly as we otherwise would have, sad to say!

    Oh, so now you are saying that it doesn’t matter whom the President is, that our enemies will behave about the same. OK, fine, but that means, therefore, that you have just invalidated your previous claim that President Obama is stronger on foreign policy than Governor Romney.

    So, no, I don’t see the views of non-Americans, of pretty much anti-Americans, as being anything worth crediting as important or to be paid any respect. We did it their way in 2008, and all we got was a stagnant economy, less respect abroad, and a weaker America.

    I can only conclude from this statement that you do not hold important having friendly relations with other countries, which has been the mantra for the Republican Party for decades, as in Republicans withholding funding from the United Nations. With the growth of the global economy, it is more important than ever to maintain strong and vibrant relations with our global counterparts. The chart indicates that President Obama and Secretary Clinton have done a good job in foreign relations, a fact which you should acknowledge and cheer.

    What it indicates is that foreigners like it better when America is weaker, and they see President Obama as having led to a weaker America.

  5. Wagonwheel says:

    WW wrote:

    We elected Barack Hussein Obama, and the Iranians are trying to build atomic bombs. We elected the guy with the Islamic name, who was going to bring peace, and the Palestinians still won’t stop shooting rockets into Israel. We elected a great conciliator, and the Taliban are still trying to take over Afghanistan. We helped the Libyans themselves throw off the yoke of Muammar al-Qadafi. Ask Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith just how much good that did us.

    These activities have been going on long before President Obama came on the scene. But I understand well, Mr Editor, that no matter what the President does, you will be opposed, not due to any logic, but due to your partisan extremism. We’ve seen your type in Congress for almost four years now, earning very rightfully the label of dysfunctional. Under your dysfunctional opposition, we have not recovered as rapidly as we otherwise would have, sad to say!

    Oh, so now you are saying that it doesn’t matter whom the President is, that our enemies will behave about the same. OK, fine, but that means, therefore, that you have just invalidated your previous claim that President Obama is stronger on foreign policy than Governor Romney.

    No, Mr Editor, that is not what I am saying. What I am saying, and have said so consistently, is that Republicans will do whatever it takes, ethical or unethical, moral or immoral, legal or criminal, to obtain and retain power. You are part of this mindset, to the point of creating and supporting a dysfunctional Congress when the country and our fellow citizens are in crisis. This disqualifies you and your Party, but unfortunately, this does not translate to election failure, because you have managed both to fool too many voters and also to suppress enough voters in order to dominate. In the process, what were moderate Republicans have been either thrown aside or forced politically to fall in line. Your usual polite demeanor does not obscure the fact that you are one of these extremists. It’s just that you encourage the less polite, the nasties, like koolo and John, to carry your honey buckets for you. What ever has happened to your “Comments and Content Policy”?

    What it indicates is that foreigners like it better when America is weaker, and they see President Obama as having led to a weaker America.

    I note that we have not had a successful attack on our homeland under President Obama. And we have also taken care of bin Laden. This is weakness, Mr Editor? Please! Your partisan/extreme ideology is destroying your ability to examine events and outcomes for what they really are. Moreover, your warhawk mentality, in which only military might is defined as strength, is showing! That’s mighty shallow!

  6. Wagonwheel says:

    Wonder how they feel about Obama in Israel? Bibi is very popular there, but Obama treats him like dirt.

    Citation please!

    In order to protect Netanyahu’s Israel, President Obama has only managed to create a global coalition, including Russia and China, to impose sanctions on Iran which are biting them pretty hard, to the point that Iran appears to be on the verge of calling for negotiation meetings. Moreover, the President is in frequent communication with Netanyahu. I understand that the only solution to the Iran nuclear problem is your warhawk mentality to attack them. At this point, that would be most foolish, as even Netanyahu agrees. So your hatred remark is way off base and as usual, not in touch with the facts, Eric.

  7. Hoagie says:

    Obama’s put together a coalition to impose sanctions on Iran? Well, if anyone knows how to ruin an economy it would be Obama. I pity the poor Iranians.

  8. Eric says:

    I can only conclude from this statement that you do not hold important having friendly relations with other countries

    As a nation, I would rather be respected than loved. Obama is a weiner. The Iranians don’t respect him, nor do the Russians or Chinese.

  9. Eric says:

    In order to protect Netanyahu’s Israel, President Obama has only managed to create a global coalition, including Russia and China, to impose sanctions on Iran which are biting them pretty hard

    The Iranians aren’t the least bit scared of Obama, and the Russians and Chinese have done nothing but gum up the works. Iran saw what a wimp obama was during the “Green Revolution” when the government cracked down on the milllons of protesters while Obama stood by and did nothing.