Here It Comes – The October Surprise – Iran To Stop Work On Nukes, or Hell Freezes Over

Bend Over everyone, here it comes, the BO OCTOBER Surprise. Now as you read this, you have to suspend belief that BO will get an agreement to stop enriching uranium for a bomb, and we’re going to lift Iranian Sanctions. Oh how effing convenient a week before the elections. So, here is what you have to believe, Iran gives in. What’s it for them? Everything and the bomb. We are to believe the bowing BO the appeaser will walk back with a Chamberlain Style Agreement. The Gullible PM from Britian believed Hilter, and then had his ass shot off, and this will be no different. The gullible Appeaser will come in and say Iran gave up and we have Peace in Our Time. For those who belive this, I have some land by the Cheaspeake Bay for sale, but only visit it at low tide on the new moon.

Another Source: http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4294672,00.html

The BO October Surprise (or We Get Screwed)

Well we knew this was coming. Reminiscent of dealings that took place a little over thirty years ago as the same Ayatollah Ali Khamenei released the fifty-two American hostages that had been held for over a year on the day that President Ronald Reagan was inaugurated, a highly placed source is saying that Iran and U.S. negotiators have come to an agreement regarding Iran’s nuclear program. This agreement would ensure Iran could continue enrichment of uranium and remove sanctions placed on it by the United States. There is no question to the political timing of the news coming out.

I can’t say that this comes as any surprise. The saber rattling that was taking place frankly was more crying wolf, just as it has been for the past two decades.

Reza Kahlili writes,

The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections.

The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March. Iran is in the throes of massive inflation and citizen unrest because of the sanctions.

French intelligence verified today that Yukiya Amano, the current director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has been given the go-ahead by the U.S. to be ready to travel to Iran and announce the agreement, according to Hamid Reza Zakeri, a former intelligence officer in the regime who has defected to Europe.

The source in Tehran said Khamenei has made it clear that unless he receives Obama’s written guarantees, he will not begin the process, which would dramatically boost Obama’s re-election chances. If the guarantees are not given, Khamenei has warned, Iran will speed up its nuclear program.

The guarantees would ensure the regime’s right to peaceful enrichment, quickly remove many of the sanctions, accept that Iran’s nuclear program does not have a military dimension and relieve international pressure on the regime while it continues its nuclear program. Also, the U.S. would announce that the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists was the work of a foreign country, though Israel would not be named, to increase legal pressure on Israel.

This post http://frontporchpolitics.com/2012/10/october-surprise-obama-cuts-deal-with-iran-over-nukes/
Continue Reading on freedomoutpost.com http://freedomoutpost.com/?p=3516

22 Comments

  1. U.S. Officials Say Iran Has Agreed to Nuclear Talks
    By HELENE COOPER and MARK LANDLER
    Published: October 20, 2012

    WASHINGTON — The United States and Iran have agreed for the first time to one-on-one negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program, according to Obama administration officials, setting the stage for what could be a last-ditch diplomatic effort to avert a military strike on Iran.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/21/world/iran-said-ready-to-talk-to-us-about-nuclear-program.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

    OK Wagonwheel 3 SOURCES

  2. How about this supposed October Surprise?

    Republicans bracing for ‘October surprise’ as Gloria Allred ‘prepares for Romney revelation’

    By DAILY MAIL REPORTER | PUBLISHED: 01:02 EST, 20 October 2012 | UPDATED: 01:03 EST, 20 October 2012

    Republicans are bracing themselves for Gloria Allred to make a potentially damaging revelation about Mitt Romney, just weeks before the election.

    The pro-President Obama lawyer is rumoured to be preparing for her so-called ‘October surprise’ in which she will strike the Republican presidential hopeful’s chances by unearthing some sort of secret or scandal.

    Ms Allred has refused to comment on the rumours, which first surfaced in a tweet by the Drudge Report’s Matt Drudge on Thursday.

    ‘Here she comes. Hearing Gloria Allred out there again, about to make a move. After all, it’s her time of the campaign. Team O at the ready!!’ Mr Drudge wrote on Twitter.

    More at the link. We don’t know if it’s true or not; Mitt Romney has led such a perfect life that the Democrats are dumbfounded, and are looking for something, anything, with which to tarnish his image, and make the election about something other than President Obama’s actual record in office.

    And these things can work: the very late revelation of George Bush’s DUI arrest and conviction — something he could have avoided being an issue if he had disclosed it himself, months earlier — probably cost him the popular vote win (he was slightly ahead right before that October surprise), and he — and the country — are damned fortunate for the electoral college system which put him in the White House. CBS News was going to try it in 2004, with a Sixty Minutes program on missing Iraqi weapons scheduled for two days before the election; it was only the fact that The New York Times went ahead with the story early which gave the Bush campaign sufficient time to respond and limit the damage.

  3. Of course, the Iranians would want to see President Obama re-elected, because they know that, as long as he is in office, the United States will do nothing to stop the Iranian nuclear program, while if Mitt Romney is elected, he just might.

  4. Editor says:
    October 20, 2012 at 19:55

    Of course, the Iranians would want to see President Obama re-elected, because they know that, as long as he is in office, the United States will do nothing to stop the Iranian nuclear program, while if Mitt Romney is elected, he just might.

    What does Iran have to lose in this deal?? Nothing. They’ll do it to get BO re-elected, congratulate their fellow muslim, and go on like nothing happened. And we’ll be the ultimate losers all the way around. They’ll build BO up, and then pull the magical Persian Rug from under his feet.

    For those who think I’m cynical, I do not have a single cynical bone in my body, they all are.

  5. More at the link. We don’t know if it’s true or not; Mitt Romney has led such a perfect life that the Democrats are dumbfounded, and are looking for something, anything, with which to tarnish his image, and make the election about something other than President Obama’s actual record in office.

    Mitt Romney has already tarnished his own reputation, and needs no help from any comments from either friend or foe. This is why we are beginning to see endorsements of Obama from surprising newspapers, one in Tampa, one in Colarado, and one in Salt Lake City of all places.

    Regarding the alleged Iranian offer to negotiate, if this report is true, then we are seeing Iran attempting to hedge her bets, knowing that Romney has been making noises like a war hawk.

    The unified sanction policy of President Obama may be squeezing the Iranians beyond what they can bear. Instead of speculating, let us wait to see what is really going on.

  6. The following is from Bill Flax’s Op/Ed in Forbes 10/18/12.

    Four Americans died. Obama lied. The press complied.

    Republicans have been trying to highlight the terrorist attack on our Libyan embassy for weeks, but recognizing how damaging this episode was to Obama’s credibility, media coverage has been subdued. Who requested what security and when is important, but these things always appear obvious in hindsight.

    Much more telling is the way our hyper-partisan press ignored how the administration initially attributed Benghazi to some YouTube video nobody watched. This was a fiction the press corps condoned. It took Team Obama two weeks before acknowledging that it was a well orchestrated terrorist attack.

    Blaming “The Innocence of Muslims,” yielded Obama an alibi. His foreign policy failings could be excused. For a president prone to apologizing to Muslims, this was perfect: it was America’s fault. If only those pesky Christians back home would behave, peace would come to the Islamic World.

    Our UN ambassador Susan Rice repeatedly attributed the attack to a spontaneous protest erupting in response to the “heinous” film. Obama mentioned the movie six times in his own speech to the UN. He did this despite credible proof there had not been any protest. Libyan officials had already confirmed it as terrorism. Our enemies conducted a coordinated assault against a lightly guarded consulate on September 11th.

    Obama “led from behind” in toppling Muammar Qaddafi’s dictatorship in Libya, then boastfully declared victory. But the ferocious attack which left four Americans dead exposed the president’s flaccid diplomacy. His legacy in North Africa smolders. Libya appears on the verge of becoming another Somalia, a failed state ruled by roaming warlords. Egypt could well be controlled by Islamic fascists.

    However, the administration’s blatant lies may be even more troubling. A consistent failing of Team Obama has been its disingenuous spin; a government by altruistic sound bites masking their personal ambitions. This entire presidency reflects a choreographed charade calculating every action per its electoral ramifications.

    The second presidential debate provides an exclamation point to the scurrilous interlude of this administration. In one entertaining exchange, Mr. Romney called the president’s bluff. He asked Obama to state for the record that he had denoted the battle at the Benghazi embassy “terrorism” before jaunting off to Las Vegas for a fundraiser the next day.

    The president, exhibiting an incredible poker face, stared straight into the cameras and misled the American people about what he said and when; even challenging Romney to “get the transcript.”

    As Mitt Romney rounded third to score the winning run, Candy Crowley, the debate moderator, butted in; tripping Romney to affirm the president, “He — he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take — it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.”

    A gloating Obama chimed in, “Can you say that a little louder, Candy!” He later scolded Romney about how “offensive” it was for him to question the administration’s selfless intentions.

    He does have stones.

    But even the hyper-partisan press could not sanction this lie for long. After the event, Ms. Crowley quickly backtracked, admitting that Romney was “right in the main.” This is like in an umpire deliberately getting in a runner’s way, calling him out during a decisive World Series moment, then admitting the call was blown at a postgame press conference.

    Benghazi, the White House cover-up and an enabling media offer a microcosm for the whole Obama presidency. His economic policies have been wasteful and counterproductive; doing more to buttress cronyism than bring recovery. His social policies radically depart from traditional American values. Obama’s foreign policy is in shambles. Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.

    The president’s outreach to the Muslim world has predictably backfired. No amount of spin can fix what his meddling has broken. Qaddafi in Libya and Mubarak in Egypt were not nice guys. But, and this is crucial, Mubarak was our guy. By letting them topple the alternative wasn’t Mother Theresa. We now have chaos across the Middle East and North Africa.

    Fortunately for Obama, liberals control the dissemination of thought. The media, entertainment industries, educational system and much of government skew very far left of Middle America. If the press were honest, or at least kept Democrats honest, Obama would probably still carry Washington D.C., but few if any states.

    But even this decided home field advantage won’t save Obama’s presidency

  7. This Forbes piece is one more attempt by the right wing press to make a something out of nothing, then conflate this to the big picture, all in an attempt to weaken a strong point in President Obama’s record. It is not working!

    Let us see how Willard Mitt Romney fares in the Tuesday night debate on foreign policy. In this arena, without a doubt, President Obama’s strength is Candidate Romney’s weakness, among his many weaknesses.

  8. This Forbes piece is one more attempt by the right wing press to make a something out of nothing, then conflate this to the big picture, all in an attempt to weaken a strong point in President Obama’s record. It is not working!

    Let us see how Willard Mitt Romney fares in the Tuesday night debate on foreign policy. In this arena, without a doubt, President Obama’s strength is Candidate Romney’s weakness, among his many weaknesses.

    You’ve got to be kidding! This Libya thing is like a dead fish whose stink gets worse the more it rots.

  9. President Obama then Candy Crowley should did take care of the Romney lie on “this Libya thing” just fine.

    And how about Romney’s flawed overseas jaunt in which he proceeded to insult the Brits on the Olympics. And then Romney’s saying he’s going to get tough on China and Iran. Please!

  10. This story wouldn’t surprise me at all. It’s just one muslim protecting the other.

    Iran Says Obama Sent Secret Message Through Swiss Envoy Recognizing Their Nuclear Rights…

    Wouldn’t surpise me, especaially when you consider the prior love notes Obama has sent Ayatollah Khamenei.

    TEHRAN (FNA) – Senior Iranian parliamentary sources revealed on Saturday that the Swiss envoy to Tehran has quoted US President Barack Obama as acknowledging Iran’s nuclear rights.

    Swiss Ambassador to Tehran Livia Leu Agosti attended a meeting with senior Iranian foreign ministry officials a few days ago to submit a letter from the US president to Tehran leaders.

    more here:
    http://weaselzippers.us/2012/10/21/iran-says-obama-sent-secret-message-through-swiss-envoy-recognizing-their-nuclear-rights/

  11. President Obama then Candy Crowley should did take care of the Romney lie on “this Libya thing” just fine.

    Further evidence that Passive-Aggressive Perry needs a straitjacket, and pronto. A general mention of “acts of terror” followed by a LYING massive push to blame a video for the murders, followed by a refusal for a week to outright call the murders terror” is, to mental defectives like Perry, Dictator Obama “telling the truth.”

    Please send a padded wagon to Lewes, immediately, for this thick-browed Neanderthal.

  12. Yorkshire, to be sure, we have a few religious extremist savages of our own who think nothing of terrorizing women seeking abortions or of bullying or even murdering homosexuals, for example. We don’t need any like these truly evil Taliban savages.

    Regarding your allegation about President Obama and Iran, I suggest you pay more attention to credible sources before going of on something written by “weazelzippers”. You don’t really believe that President Obama would do such a thing, now do you, honestly?

  13. Yorkshire, to be sure, we have a few religious extremist savages of our own who think nothing of terrorizing women seeking abortions or of bullying or even murdering homosexuals, for example.

    We also have more than a few non-religious extremist savages of our own who think nothing of terrorizing those w/whom they disagree because they’re religious, traditional, or just a Republican.

    You don’t really believe that President Obama would do such a thing, now do you, honestly?

    In. A. Heartbeat.

  14. WW:
    Regarding your allegation about President Obama and Iran, I suggest you pay more attention to credible sources before going of on something written by “weazelzippers”. You don’t really believe that President Obama would do such a thing, now do you, honestly?

    Sure I thought it was bogus (NOT). Don’t ya think it’s weird that so many sources including the NYT are saying how open BO is to talking with Iran? Why right now?

  15. Further evidence that Passive-Aggressive Perry needs a straitjacket, and pronto. A general mention of “acts of terror” followed by a LYING massive push to blame a video for the murders, followed by a refusal for a week to outright call the murders terror” is, to mental defectives like Perry, Dictator Obama “telling the truth.”

    Please send a padded wagon to Lewes, immediately, for this thick-browed Neanderthal.

    You just cannot disagree then debate, can you koolo? Is this, your anonymous, cowardly, disrespectful and bullying behavior, a model for your students to follow? You are emotionally unfit to be a classroom teacher!

    On the topic, not only are you factually incorrect, because as Candy Crowley indicated, President Obama did mention terrorism on day two. Thus Romney was caught in a lie, again, as the evidence has demonstrated.

    There has been a lack of clarity about exactly what did happen, because as yet all the facts are not in. Perhaps we will never know.

    Nevertheless, it is apparent that Republicans are trying to make a political issue out of this by selecting out what they can to make the President look bad.

    And worse, Chairman Issa has released to the public documents which reveal the names of Libyans who are friendly to us. This borders on treason, in my view, and shows how desperate Republicans are on this issue, and on this election.

    I am sure this will come up in Tuesday’s debate, so let us see if any new and credible information is forthcoming. I say credible, because Romney is well know as a fountain of non-credible statements, which right there disqualify him from the post he seeks.

    We need more information on this tragic event!

  16. Sure I thought it was bogus (NOT). Don’t ya think it’s weird that so many sources including the NYT are saying how open BO is to talking with Iran? Why right now?

    On this very serious issue, I think it quite appropriate to be talking to Iran, assuming that is now happening, at any time. I am surprised that you would question it, Yorkshire!

  17. On the topic, not only are you factually incorrect, because as Candy Crowley indicated, President Obama did mention terrorism on day two. Thus Romney was caught in a lie, again, as the evidence has demonstrated.

    I suggest you read what I previously wrote, buffoon. Not to mention, why did Crowley backtrack later in the debate, hmm? Dictator Obama spoke of general acts of terror the next day, and then proceeded to LIE and blame a silly video for something which it was actually blameless. And, the guy who made the video is in JAIL. If this was the Bush admin, you’d be screaming about a police state. But you’re a cowardly hypocrite who who has the same size balls as Dictator Obama.

    You are emotionally unfit to be a classroom teacher!

    You’re unfit to be a husband, father and a basic, functioning human being. Deal with it, scumbag.

  18. Here’s Three Major Endorsements that show you what they think of BO. HMMMM, what do all three have in common??? That’s it, Communist, Socialistic, Progressive backgrounds. Just what we don’t need. Right Carnivore??

    Chavez, Castro, Putin: Four more years!

    The latest [dictator] to publicly announce his support for the commander-in-chief’s reelection bid was Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez, who this week assured he’d vote for Obama if he were from the United States. The America-bashing strongman made the announcement on state-owned television, saying “Obama is a good guy” and that if Obama was from Caracas, he’d surely return the favor by voting for Chavez.

    Read more: http://times247.com/articles/obama-receives-endorsements-from-three-dictators#ixzz29yiXrc68

  19. President Obama then Candy Crowley should did take care of the Romney lie on “this Libya thing” just fine.

    Candy (she obviously eats a lot of candy) Crowley had no business taking sides in the debate. Romney was right – why did the Obama Regime persist in spreading the video lie for weeks after the terror attack?

Comments are closed.