Has the Democratic National Convention any documented history of vote fraud amongst the delegates? From Twitchy:
From the convention website:
Please complete the following form regarding your organization’s primary contact information and the authorized designee(s) to whom your 2012 Democratic National Convention credentials can be issued.
All pickup persons must have a state-issued ID that matches the name submitted below.
We suppose it shouldn’t be surprising, what with the racist Democratic National Convention line-up being paler than the MSNBC masthead. Conservatives call out the DNC for their rampant hypocrisy. Oh, the irony!
Irony? At THE FIRST STREET JOURNAL we call that Democrisy.
Indeed, why would the Democrites even need to worry about voter fraud within their convention? The renomination of Barack Hussein Obama as their presidential candidate is assured, and anyone who actually did vote against the President’s renomination, this not being a secret ballot, would immediately expose himself to scrutiny — and security! — and if such a delegate were fraudulent, he would be quickly identified and hustled away to the hoosegow.
So, what do we have? At the Democrite National Convention, with no history of voter fraud, with an “election” the outcome of which is not in any doubt, with a ballot process which would immediately identify anyone casting a fraudulent ballot, and a system in which virtually every delegate is well-known to many other delegates, they need voter security, security! damn it, while in a real, public election, the outcome of which is not a foregone conclusion, where millions of voters are known to no one, where vote fraud has occurred in the past, and where casting a fraudulent ballot would not be readily apparent, why, it’s downright unAmerican to require that the voters provide proof of whom they are.
To liberals, that makes perfect sense; to people of common sense, it doesn’t.