Skip to content
 

The Democrite National Convention

Has the Democratic National Convention any documented history of vote fraud amongst the delegates? From Twitchy:

From the convention website:

Please complete the following form regarding your organization’s primary contact information and the authorized designee(s) to whom your 2012 Democratic National Convention credentials can be issued.

Authorized Pickup
All pickup persons must have a state-issued ID that matches the name submitted below.

We suppose it shouldn’t be surprising, what with the racist Democratic National Convention line-up being paler than the MSNBC masthead. Conservatives call out the DNC for their rampant hypocrisy. Oh, the irony!

Irony? At THE FIRST STREET JOURNAL we call that Democrisy.

Indeed, why would the Democrites even need to worry about voter fraud within their convention? The renomination of Barack Hussein Obama as their presidential candidate is assured, and anyone who actually did vote against the President’s renomination, this not being a secret ballot, would immediately expose himself to scrutiny — and security! — and if such a delegate were fraudulent, he would be quickly identified and hustled away to the hoosegow.

So, what do we have? At the Democrite National Convention, with no history of voter fraud, with an “election” the outcome of which is not in any doubt, with a ballot process which would immediately identify anyone casting a fraudulent ballot, and a system in which virtually every delegate is well-known to many other delegates, they need voter security, security! damn it, while in a real, public election, the outcome of which is not a foregone conclusion, where millions of voters are known to no one, where vote fraud has occurred in the past, and where casting a fraudulent ballot would not be readily apparent, why, it’s downright unAmerican to require that the voters provide proof of whom they are.

To liberals, that makes perfect sense; to people of common sense, it doesn’t.

3 Comments

  1. Koolo says:

    Democrats are racist, pure and simple, for maintaining such an ID requirement. Perry has taught us that much.

  2. Editor says:

    It’s a good thing that there are no real examples of voter fraud, right?

    LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) – A Democratic state legislator from east Arkansas, his father and two campaign workers pleaded guilty Wednesday to conspiracy to commit election fraud after federal prosecutors said they bribed absentee voters and destroyed ballots in a special election last year.

    Prosecutors said Democratic Rep. Hudson Hallum of Marion, Kent Hallum, Phillip Wayne Carter and Sam Malone acknowledged that they participated in a conspiracy to bribe voters to influence absentee votes in the Arkansas District 54 primary, runoff and general elections in 2011. The three were released pending a sentencing hearing.

    “In a nation in which every person’s vote matters, protecting the integrity of the electoral process from those who seek to win office by cheating the system is critical,” U.S. Attorney Jane Duke said in a statement released by her office. “Voter fraud schemes such as that carried out in the 2011 District 54 race have the devastating effect of eroding public confidence in elected officials and disenfranchising voters.”

    A Democratic Party spokeswoman said Hallum indicated he would step down from his seat, but officials had not received a formal resignation by Wednesday afternoon.

    Hallum didn’t respond to phone messages from The Associated Press seeking comment, and Arkansas House officials said he hadn’t spoken with House Speaker Robert Moore. But in an email sent to other Democratic legislators, Hallum apologized for his actions.

    “I took some bad advice that led to some bad decisions on my part. I am going to stand up and accept full responsibility for my actions,” Hallum wrote. “I am truly sorry because I know this news will have an effect on everyone’s upcoming race.”

    Prosecutors said Hallum and his father, Kent, tasked Carter and Malone with obtaining absentee ballot applications for certain voters and assisting voters in filling out the ballots, “actually completing absentee ballots in some instances without regard to the voter’s actual candidate choice.”