Jennie Johnstone shared a link.
8 hours ago
You’d best get the full story before you take sides on the Israeli/Palestine issue. You can’t help but notice the Nazi like operation of Israel upon Gaza. Invest time into understanding it. Seriously. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dTnHcHsUNM0&feature=youtu.be
The Rothschilds, Hitler, Holocaust, Israel & Zionist World Government
Published on Dec 7, 2012
“Jews will fall victim once again.”
Jim Condit Jr. and Christopher Jon Bjerknes (whose maternal grandfather was Jewish) discuss their intensive research and their many Jewish and non-Jewish sources (like Dietrich Bronder, Hennecke Kardel, Eustace Mullins, Antony Sutton, Samuel Untermayer, Donn de Grand Pré, James Pool, Bryan Mark Rigg, Alan Abrams, Edwin Black, Lenni Brenner, Norman Finkelstein, Ignatius Trebitsch-Lincoln, Moses Pinkeles, Hans Frank, Douglas Reed, David Gardner, Greg Hallett, Erik Jan Hanussen, Moses Hess, Theodor Herzl, Louis L. Snyder, Ian Kershaw and many others) concerning the Jewish roots of Adolf Hitler, the involvement of Jewish bankers in the rise of Hitler and the NSDAP, the Jewish soldiers in Hitler’s army, the Holocaust, why Zionist Theodor Herzl promoted anti-Semitism, the Jewish financiers behind the Soviet Union, Netanyahu’s wish to attack Iran, and the prediction of Moses Hess (creator of National Socialism in 1860) that there would be a race war and that Jews would have to suffer in order to be reestablished in Palestine…
Recorded on Wednesday May 23 2007.
And then there was this comment:
Dave McDonald Calling the Israelis “Nazis” actually helps reinforce jewish propaganda about WW II, aka the psychological brick of the sinister Joo World Order. The Germans were fighting against the jew bankers who funded Bolshevism destroyed Russia and who planned on doing the same to the rest of the planet, and the “evil nazi” “gas chambers” story also just so happens to be a huge part of the foundational myth of Israel. Even Stalin himself was so impressed with the accomplishments of the Germans that he shifted his entire policy of the USSR to try to be more like NSDAP Germany, purging thousands of jewish communists and deporting jews to Siberia. This is why the jews poisoned Stalin, who died on PURIM. Say what you will about Stalin, but he definitely became sick of working for the jews and he lashed out at them harshly, undoing everything the so-called Bolshevik Revolution ever accomplished, setting the stage for the collapse of communism, and sending the bolsheviks packing for America, where they re-emerged as the neo-Cons aka NEO-COHENS. Stalin set the stage for the massive victory being accomplished now by Comrade Putin. It may benefit our cause to call the Israelis (and neo-Cohens) “bolsheviks” instead of “Nazis”, SINCE THAT IS WHAT THEY ARE!! Don’t reinforce the jewish narrative of WW II, it only benefits Israel. Calling the Israelis “Nazis” actually provides cover for them, whereas calling them “bolsheviks” blows their cover and shatters their essential foundational myths.
Of course, Mr McDonald, when called on it by me, stated:
I am anti Israeli genocide, homocide, deception, bribery, and sabotage of the American political system. If that that makes me “anti-semitic” then so be it. Learn the true defintion and application of the expression. I especially despise AIPAC and all of the AIPAC whores serving in American government who serve Israel and the Jewish lobby and ignore the plight of America and her citizens! American cities are allowed to ROT while we send our money to these parasites and fight their imperialist wars instituted through deception and fraud!
I have said it before: it is intellectually possible to be opposed to Zionism and to Israeli government policy and still not be anti-Semitic, but I have never seen anyone who actually fit in that rather narrow intellectual slot. Mr McDonald then added another comment:
The modern founder of Zionism Theodor Herzl once said:
“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews. . . become worse. . . this will assist in realization of our plans. . .I have an excellent idea. . . I shall induce anti-semites to liquidate Jewish wealth. . . The anti-semites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The anti-semites shall be our best friends”.
Skipping over a few comments, another person posted evidence that the quote Mr McDonald attributed to Theodor Herzl was a fabrication, so I gave Mr McDonald the benefit of the doubt:
As it happens, I have Mr Herzl’s “The Jewish State” on my Kindle. Please, be good enough to tell me where I can find that statement in his book. Why do I ask for the citation? Because I seriously doubt that he ever said that, and I doubt that you can point me to a CREDIBLE source which cites it. He did state that the sufferings of the jews would have to worsen for the idea of emigration to the Holy Land would occur, but I very much doubt that he said the rest.
And that means that Mr McDonald needs to reassess his views. If he has been quoting falsifications — things I assume he did not know were untrue — it has to be asked how many other things he knows are from deliberately falsified sources. If the information on which he has based his opinions is false, does that not mean he must revise his opinions?
But, though given a perfect out, Mr McDonald instead doubled down:
Whether fake or not. .all you have to do is look at their adgenda..an d his statement resonates with truth. You will find site that say the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is fraudulent. .but all you have to do…if you are awake. .is look around and see how everything in it is coming to its fruition.
There’s more, and it’s just as tedious, but it is, in fact, very serious. Mr McDonald is just one example; there are thousands and thousands of other people just like him, who parrot words and hold beliefs which could have come straight out of Mein Kampf.1 When I read the words that they are writing, I can easily associate them with the not-so-distant past; millions of Germans swallowed those words, and millions of Germans voted for the Nazis, and if it was the Nazi’s Sturmabteilung thugs who took most of the actions during Kristallnacht, it and the anti-Jewish programs of the Nazis could not have continued without the tacit support of millions of Christian German civilians, some who cheered, and some who watched, and some who just looked the other way.
It is because I will not look the other way2 that I continue to read that kind of stuff, and continue to argue with the anti-Semites, and continue to publicize the crap that they say.
From the Conservative Tribune, via Gretchen:
Every American officer, regardless of branch of service, take the same oath upon their appointment to the military. They swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.”
The language used is not dissimilar to that of the presidential oath of office as it appears in Article II of the Constitution: “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
The American oaths of office are different from those of so many nations around the world, because we do not swear allegiance to a person, a religious sect, or even to the nation’s citizens. America’s leaders swear to uphold the Constitution, the document in which the individual freedoms that make America unique among all nations in history are enshrined and guaranteed.
It should come as no surprise, then, that when long-service American military officers see the principles of the Constitutional repeatedly violated, disregarded, and even held in contempt, they take offense.
More at the original.The article continues to tell the reader about several retired military officers who are very critical of the President, but noted that several high-ranking officers who are still on active duty have criticize the Commander-in-Chief as well, including General James Amos, the Commandant of the Marine Corps, who “recently made comments highly critical of the Obama administration’s leadership and policy in Iraq.”1 General Amos four-year term as Commandant expires in October, and the Senate has already confirmed General Joseph F. Dunford Jr., currently Commander of the International Security Assistance Force and United States Forces-Afghanistan, to be the next Commandant.
Retired military men have every right to speak out against the Commander-in-Chief. They are civilians, and have absolute freedom of speech. But if someone on active duty wants to complain, he needs to either retire and then say his piece, or keep his mouth shut. Barack Obama is an absolutely terrible President, the worst in my lifetime, and a rotten Commander-in-Chief, and the public were foolish beyond belief to have elected him, but that doesn’t matter: he was elected, period, and we are stuck with him for another 2½ years. As much as your Editor dislikes President Obama and his polices, he values our Constitution and the primacy of the elected civilian leadership over the military far more.
As far as I can tell, American liberalism died the day Kennedy was shot. What we have in its place is a radical left, America hating, abortion loving, gun grabbing, freedom hating atheistic ideology that is obsessed with destroying traditional values and creating an ever more powerful centralized State with themselves (meaning: left wingers) occupying almost all the positions of power.
Or, to put it another way:
Conservatives read Orwell’s 1984 and see it as a warning.
Left wingers read 1984 and see it as an instruction manual.
From Gretchen, on Facebook:
My curling iron has a warning sticker: “For External Use Only.”
I don’t even want to think about the circumstance that made the curling iron manufacturer believe that sticker was necessary.
I can think of the circumstance: the lawyers pointing out just how stupid some of their customers could be.
King Edward II could not be reached for comment.
Robert Stacey Stacy McCain has an article up — again! — in his series on the weirdos and nuts on the left:
Canadian Candidate Drops Out After Masturbation Video Surfaces
Posted on | July 22, 2014 | 43 Comments
Trish Kelly was a candidate for local office on the ticket of the liberal “Vision Vancouver” party. On July 14, local political blogger Raymond Tomlin published a 2006 video Ms. Kelly produced for a website called WayOutWest. In the two-minute video, Ms. Kelly talks about her masturbation habits: “Pretty much I do it every night, after brushing my teeth, but before putting on my jammies.” Ms. Kelly is entirely clothed in the video, during which she describes “the single lifestyle” and an occasion “giving myself the f–k of my life.” Three days after Tomlin called attention to the video, Kelly dropped out of the race for Vancouver’s Park Board:
“After 25 years of serving my community, I put my name forward as a Park Board nominee to move my life as a community activist fighting for social justice issues, to claiming a seat at the decision-making table,” Kelly stated. “Unfortunately, my work in theatre and as a sex-positive activist is being sensationalized — and will clearly continue to be — distracting from my efforts in the community and in the election campaign.”
Kelly, a popular member of Vancouver’s LGBT community, made a humorous video about masturbation, which was posted on YouTube by political activist Raymond Tomlin. . . .
“I have never hidden from this work,” Kelly said in the news release. “I hold no shame nor regret for the work I have produced. I have dedicated, and will continue to dedicate, much of my life to contributing to my community, to having difficult conversations, and to making myself vulnerable in order to make space for others.”
Wait a minute: Ms. Kelly is a “sex-positive activist,” widely recognized as a “member of Vancouver’s LGBT community,” and yet her solitary habits were the problem? Do people not understand the meaning of “LGBT”? It’s not about marching in parades, y’know.
More at the link; the emphases are in Mr McCain’s original.
Mr McCain and his commenters, your Editor amongst them, have some fun at Miss Kelly’s expense, but there’s actually a serious point to me made her. Miss Kelly again:
I feel that I’m a bridge between two groups. I’m Métis and the word Métis means a ‘blend’ or a ‘mix’ in French, and I’m also queer or bisexual. I have to claim those identities, because being femme in everyday society I can be read as just a straight woman, and being Métis I can be read as just white. So I politicize myself by owning these identities, which is part of how I politicize my identity but also part of how I act as another ally to people who are more targeted because of their visible appearance or how they’re read.
Uhhh, why does that matter? If your sex life is your own business, and no one else’s, other than your bed partner’s, why should it matter if other people “read” you as a normal woman?
Miss Kelly has managed to tell us — though perhaps somewhat unintentionally — that other people have to be confronted about her sexual preferences, or somehow, she doesn’t really matter. She is significant not for being a human being, but only because she likes to have sex with other women, and only because she is, in some undefined degree, “Métis.” However, since we are all related somewhere down the line — the common figure given is that we are all at least 20th cousins, but I’ve also seen the figure 16th cousins; it’s a statistical calculation based upon the number of couples vis a vis total population many generations ago — then we must all be “Métis” to some degree.
And that’s the liberal conundrum: we aren’t supposed to judge them on their sexuality, but the only way we can judge them on their sexuality is if we know what it is, and they seem to insist on telling us all about it. No one would judge Miss Kelly on her sexuality, if she hadn’t been making such an effort to tell us about it. Well, if she makes it our business, then she can’t combitch if we make it our business. We aren’t supposed to judge people based upon their race, either, but Miss Kelly, who apparently looks completely Caucasian, wants us to know that no, she isn’t; why does she feel the need to tell us this, unless she believes that it is somehow important information for us as far as our impressions of her go.1
The problem for the left is obvious: they claim to aspire to Dr Martin Luther King’s famous dictum that he dreamed of the time when his children would be judged not by the color of their skins but the content of their characters, but their claim is a lie. They are wholly invested in judging people by the color of their skins, or by their genitals, or by the genitals of their sexual partners. Those things are, apparently, all that matters.2 Things like character or hard work or achievement are almost meaningless to the left, because taking judgements based on things like that does not always lead to politically correct results.
Your Editor is rather amused that the lovely Miss Kelly had to withdraw from her campaign over this; I’d call it karmic justice. She claims that it’s all a message of being sex positive, but at what point did “sex positive” mean “making a sex tape?” I’m sex positive, in that I’m positive that I like sex, but somehow, some way, my darling bride and I have never thought of setting up a video camera in the bedroom so we could splash it all over the internet. Am I the only one old enough to remember when it used to be thought that people who kept talking about their sex lives were the ones least likely to actually have sex lives.
Of course, considering that Miss Kelly’s sex tape was of her masturbating, at least that part of her sex life was by herself. If only she’d taken up with Elliot Rodger . . . .
- And it worked for Fauxcahontas, now Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA)! ↩
- The University of Wisconsin at Madison passed something called the Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence, which calls for, among other things, “proportional participation of historically underrepresented racial-ethnic groups at all levels of an institution, including high status special programs, high-demand majors, and in the distribution of grades.” Perhaps the learned professors of the Faculty Senate didn’t read or understand just on what it was they were voting, but that provision cannot be interpreted as anything other than stating that grades should be evenly distributed by race. There are denials coming from UW-M that that is what was meant, but it’s certainly what it says. ↩
First Question – I’m noticing more of the same type news that does not bode well. Military Officers, Border invasion, again with bankers. A trend …………………
Update – Add 6 to the List Is there a Banker’s Plague that is unreported, or is there a Sinister plot
Banker Deaths Climb to 15: Goldman Sachs Managing Director Found Dead
Another high level banker has been found dead.
Nicholas Valtz, a 39-year old managing director at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York, was found dead Sunday afternoon in Napeague Harbor where he had reportedly gone earlier that day to kiteboard. Valtz’ body was found still tied to his kite. Interesting, who tied them?
Kiteboarding, also called kitesurfing, combines elements of windsurfing and paragliding which can garner speeds of up to 40 mph. His brother told Bloomberg that Valtz was still new to the sport.
Better than the last one:
Are 9 Dead Bankers A Sign Of Pending Economic Collapse?
February 27, 2014 by Wayne Allyn Root
Hello, I’m Wayne Allyn Root for Personal Liberty. Something very big and very bad is happening. Prominent bankers are dying in droves. Have you ever heard of eight bankers committing suicide in a matter of just a few weeks?
A ninth banker was found dead only days ago. What is driving successful bankers with families to kill themselves in droves?
Here’s the tip-off that this is a very big story: The mainstream media are not covering it. There are nine dead bankers (and counting), and the story isn’t even mentioned in the national news. That itself is a major news story.
Bankers are dying so fast, you’d think they were all dentists. You get the joke, right? Dentists have the highest suicide rate of any profession. Sometimes, you need a little humor to brighten up a very dark story. But keep in mind, at no time in history have nine dentists all died under mysterious circumstances in a matter of a few weeks.
This story is real. The dead are:
William Broeksmit, 58-year-old former senior executive at Deutsche Bank AG.
Karl Slym, 51-year-old Tata Motors managing director.
Gabriel Magee, 39-year-old JPMorgan banker.
Mike Dueker, 50-year-old chief economist of a U.S. investment bank.
Richard Talley, the 57-year-old founder of American Title Services in Centennial, Colo.
Tim Dickenson, U.K.-based communications director at Swiss Re AG.
Ryan Henry Crane, 37-year-old executive at JPMorgan.
Li Junjie, 33-year-old Hong Kong banker.
James Stewart Jr., former CEO of the National Bank of Commerce.
JP Morgan employee who fell to death from bank’s London office in Canary Wharf named as Gabriel Magee Jim Armitage Author Biography
Wednesday 29 January 2014
(NOTE: Go to the website to see the “roof” he fell from. Suicide or murder?)
The bank worker who died after falling from the roof of JP Morgan’s European headquarters in Canary Wharf on Tuesday morning has been named as Gabriel Magee, a senior IT programmer.
The 39-year-old American had been at the investment banking giant for 10 years in New York and London, working his way up to become a vice president in CIB Technology. Colleagues and friends expressed shock at his death.
Mr Magee plunged from the top of the 500ft European headquarters of the investment bank at 8am, at the peak of the financial district’s rush hour. He landed on the roof of a ninth-floor podium of the building at 25 Bank Street and was pronounced dead at the scene by paramedics.
A New York-based colleague, who worked with Mr Magee at JP Morgan there, said: “It is a terrible, tragic loss. He has a lot of friends in New York that are very confused and very sad right now. He was a co-worker and a very good friend. A very smart guy, with a great sense of humour.”
Paul Grunwald, who worked with Mr Magee in New Mexico in the late 1990s, said: “I’m very saddened to learn the news. Gabe was an intern for me at Intel. He was bright, funny, and a good friend.
“I tried my best to keep him at Intel but New York and London were calling him away from the desert. I will miss him and my thoughts and prayers go out to all that loved him.”
Don’t get Mad, get Even with SCOTUS, but the marble taker did both:
Obama’s LGBT Hiring Executive Order Will Not Include Religious Exemption
ByDYLAN SCOTTPublishedJULY 18, 2014, 3:49 PM EDT
President Barack Obama plans to sign on Monday a long-awaited executive order prohibiting discrimination against LGBT people by federal contractors, and it will not include the broad religious exemption sought by religious leaders.
The Huffington Post reported on Friday that Obama’s order will add sexual orientation and gender identity to an existing non-discrimination order that covers race, sex and religion. A White House official confirmed the report to TPM. It will not include any general religious exemption for religious employers.
The order does, however, maintain an executive order by President George W. Bush that allows religious employers to prioritize hiring members of their religion, according to the official.
Donald Douglas of American Power decided to cover ANSWER’s rally and protest march against police brutality in Anaheim yesterday, and when the peaceful protesters saw someone they didn’t like, why, naturally they responded with violence of their own.
(Michael) Prysner’s a coward. He served in Iraq as a grounds surveillance technician, and word is he saw no combat, and since then has allegedly misrepresented his war record and trumped up the military heroism of other soldiers as his own.
He obviously doesn’t like being called out on it, which is why he tried to shut down my participation at a public rally by seizing my iPhone and throwing it in the street. Pretty typical for an intolerant leftist scumbag. These idiots simply cannot stand to have their activism and ideology exposed to the real light of public opinion and opprobrium. This Ain’t Hell just destroys lying loser Prysner here, “Michael Prysner: true communist hero.”
Epic loser and coward @MichaelPrysner grabbed my iPhone out of my hand and threw it in the street. He’s a pussy. pic.twitter.com/IAUj8TPK4C
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) July 19, 2014
I ran out into the street to retrieve my phone, which was still in good working condition, amazingly. At the Vine below is mental midget and dead-end ANSWER stooge Douglas Kauffman. Next to him is the mother of Manuel Diaz. I gather her son was killed by Anaheim PD and she was one of the event’s sponsors. Actually, I was not “antagonizing” anyone. I would have loved to hear her memorial to her son, but the commie stooges were blocking and tripping me as I tried to move over to listen to the speakers. She came up to me twice during the day, asking me to leave. I told her it was a public park and I just wanted to take some pictures and I’d be gone. She didn’t like that idea and called me a “disruptive force.”
— Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) July 19, 2014
There’s a lot more at Dr Douglas’ original. But the message is clear: whenever you see anti-war or anti-violence protesters, in any numbers at all, you’ll find that they are just as violent as anything they are protesting, when crossed or challenged.
Donna Miller of the Victory Girls notes that our lovely First Lady would like to impose controls so that Food Stamp SNAP users would buy healthier things.
What ICF proposes is for grocery stores to have segregated shopping carts of a designated color for use solely by consumers using EBT cards. Those carts would, in effect, be “smart carts” which would monitor what card users put into their carts. It would then talk to the shopper and give them clues on what to buy or not to buy. It would also give them verbal praise when they chose a set amount of healthy products. The idea is that after receiving enough praise, benefits recipients will choose tofu over hamburger without having o be praised. Pavlov himself would drool over this idea.
Now, I actually approve of that idea, though not for the reasons Mrs Obama does. Segregated shopping carts would let other shoppers know who is there, buying groceries on the taxpayers’ dollars rather than their own, and perhaps enforce some set of shame into the welfare recipients, and nudge them toward getting a job!
Ahhh, who am I kidding; there is no shame at all amongst welfare leches!
Sister Toldjah tells us that the Obaminablecare employer mandate just might be delayed yet again!
The study reveals nothing about the nature of the link between socialism and dishonesty. It might be a function of the relative poverty of East Germans, for example. All the same, when it comes to ethics, a capitalist upbringing appears to trump a socialist one.
Of course: when you are reared under a system which holds that people have rights to property, and that your neighbor’s things are not yours, you are going to be more honest than someone who is bought up under a system which holds that private property is evil, and that you have a right to what others have. This should be a lesson to all employers: never hire anyone who was s supporter of the Occupy movement, because he will be untrustworthy.
Darleen Click of Protein Wisdom also noted the story.
Robert Stacey Stacy McCain has a brief note about the oh-so-tolerant Shari’a schools in the Unite Kingdom. No wonder Scotland is holding an independence plebiscite!
William Teach has an article about Senatrix Elizabeth Warren’s 11 Commandments, and the hypocrisy therein. I particularly liked this one:
- “We believe that students are entitled to get an education without being crushed by debt.” (says the woman who charged $350,000 to teach one class)
Hube has little sympathy for First World Problems.
And last, but certainly not least, on Truth Before Dishonor, John Hitchcock pointed out what we already knew: Progressives and the professional media are anti-Semites. It is intellectually possible to be opposed to Israeli government policies and still not be an anti-Semite, it is intellectually conceivable to be opposed to Zionism and not be an anti-Semite, but in my many years of reading the arguments of the liberals, I have yet to encounter a single soul who has managed to meet such a challenge.
It’s the weekend and time, once again, for THE FIRST STREET JOURNAL’S version of Rule 5 Blogging. Robert Stacey Stacy McCain described Rule 5 as posting photos of pretty women somewhat déshabillé, but, on this site, our Rule 5 Blogging doesn’t put up pictures of Mila Kunis in her summer clothes, but women, in full military gear, serving their countries in the armed forces. The terribly sexist authors on this site celebrate strong women, women who can take care of themselves and take care of others, women who have been willing to put their lives on the line in some not-so-friendly places, women who truly do have the “We can do it!” attitude.